Environment details: Fort scott KS
poor quality, high pollution levels.
Environment details: White swan WA
Water quality is good; protected source contributes.
Compare Environment: Fort scott KS vs White swan WA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Fort scott | White swan |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 478 | 590 |
| Water Quality | 4/10 | 7/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | poor quality, high pollution levels. | Water quality is good; protected source contributes. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.7 | 1.73 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 25 | 32 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Fort scott vs White swan
- The water quality in White swan is superior at 7/10 compared to 4/10 in Fort scott.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in White swan with an average index of 1.73 compared to 1.7 in Fort scott.
- White swan experiences more days with poor air quality at 32 compared to 25 in Fort scott.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.