Demographics details for Fort scott, KS vs Union springs, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort scott, KS vs Union springs, AL.
| Data | Fort scott | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,615 | 3,242 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 28.1 years |
| Median Income | $45,206 | $24,921 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 17.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Fort scott vs Union springs
- In Fort scott, the population is higher at 7,615, compared to 3,242 in Union springs.
- Residents in Fort scott have a higher median age of 38.3 years compared to 28.1 years in Union springs.
- Fort scott has a higher median income of $45,206 compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort scott at 36.0% compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
- The poverty level is higher in Union springs at 25%, compared to 14% in Fort scott.
- Union springs has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Fort scott.
Demographics
Demographics Fort scott vs Union springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort scott | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 69 |
| White | 87 | 4 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort scott vs Union springs
- In Union springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 69% compared to 4% in Fort scott.
- Fort scott has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 4% in Union springs.
- In Union springs, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Fort scott.
- Union springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 3% in Fort scott.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort scott at 6% compared to 4% in Union springs.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort scott and Union springs at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort scott | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 21.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 16.9% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 22.8% | 25.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 11.1% |
| Obesity | 42.7% | 49.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort scott vs Union springs
- In Union springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 18.3% in Fort scott.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort scott at 23.2% compared to 20.8% in Union springs.
- Union springs has a higher smoking rate at 25.5% compared to 22.8% in Fort scott.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort scott at 16.6% compared to 11.1% in Union springs.
- Union springs has higher obesity rates at 49.5% compared to 42.7% in Fort scott.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort scott at 21.0% compared to 15.0% in Union springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort scott | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (30) | 3.6% (117) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (1,041) | 15.1% (489) |
| Less than High School | 16.9% (1,285) | 33.7% (1,092) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (1,029) | 7.3% (237) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort scott vs Union springs
- In Union springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.4% in Fort scott.
- In Union springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.1% compared to 13.7% in Fort scott.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Union springs at 33.7%, compared to 16.9% in Fort scott.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort scott hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.5% compared to 7.3% in Union springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.