Demographics details for Fort scott, KS vs Texarkana, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort scott, KS vs Texarkana, AR.
Data | Fort scott | Texarkana |
---|---|---|
Population | 7,615 | 29,306 |
Median Age | 38.3 years | 39.1 years |
Median Income | $45,206 | $45,233 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Fort scott vs Texarkana
- The population in Texarkana is higher at 29,306, compared to 7,615 in Fort scott.
- The median age in Texarkana is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 38.3 years in Fort scott.
- Texarkana has a higher median income of $45,233, compared to $45,206 in Fort scott.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort scott at 36.0% compared to 30.0% in Texarkana.
- The poverty level is higher in Texarkana at 15%, compared to 14% in Fort scott.
- The unemployment rate in Fort scott is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.4% in Texarkana.
Demographics
Demographics Fort scott vs Texarkana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort scott | Texarkana |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 35 |
White | 87 | 56 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort scott vs Texarkana
- In Texarkana, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 35% compared to 4% in Fort scott.
- Fort scott has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 56% in Texarkana.
- Both Fort scott and Texarkana have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Texarkana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Fort scott.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort scott at 6% compared to 3% in Texarkana.
- In Texarkana, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fort scott.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort scott | Texarkana |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 20.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 15.3% |
Depression | 23.2% | 24.7% |
Smoking | 22.8% | 24.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 14.0% |
Obesity | 42.7% | 39.5% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort scott vs Texarkana
- In Texarkana, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 18.3% in Fort scott.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Texarkana at 24.7% versus 23.2% in Fort scott.
- Texarkana has a higher smoking rate at 24.4% compared to 22.8% in Fort scott.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort scott at 16.6% compared to 14.0% in Texarkana.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort scott at 42.7% compared to 39.5% in Texarkana.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort scott at 21.0% compared to 18.0% in Texarkana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort scott | Texarkana |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (30) | 1.5% (440) |
High School Diploma | 13.7% (1,041) | 21.6% (6,319) |
Less than High School | 16.9% (1,285) | 14.4% (4,229) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (1,029) | 11.1% (3,247) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort scott vs Texarkana
- In Texarkana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.4% in Fort scott.
- In Texarkana, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 13.7% in Fort scott.
- More residents in Fort scott have less than a high school education at 16.9% compared to 14.4% in Texarkana.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort scott hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.5% compared to 11.1% in Texarkana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.