Environment details: Fort scott KS
poor quality, high pollution levels.
Environment details: Starkville MS
Poor quality due to environmental concerns.
Compare Environment: Fort scott KS vs Starkville MS
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Fort scott | Starkville |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 478 | 504 |
| Water Quality | 4/10 | 3/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | poor quality, high pollution levels. | Poor quality due to environmental concerns. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.7 | 1.61 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 25 | 29 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Fort scott vs Starkville
- Water quality is rated higher in Fort scott at 4/10 compared to 3/10 in Starkville.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Fort scott with 1.7 compared to 1.61 in Starkville.
- Starkville experiences more days with poor air quality at 29 compared to 25 in Fort scott.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.