Demographics details for Fort scott, KS vs Richmond, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort scott, KS vs Richmond, MO.

Data Fort scott Richmond
Population 7,615 5,959
Median Age 38.3 years 39.9 years
Median Income $45,206 $61,694
Married Families 36.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 14% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Fort scott vs Richmond

  • In Fort scott, the population is higher at 7,615, compared to 5,959 in Richmond.
  • The median age in Richmond is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 38.3 years in Fort scott.
  • Richmond has a higher median income of $61,694, compared to $45,206 in Fort scott.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Fort scott and Richmond at 36.0%.
  • Fort scott has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Richmond.
  • The unemployment rate in Fort scott is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Richmond.

Demographics

Demographics Fort scott vs Richmond provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort scott Richmond
Black 4 2
White 87 90
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 5
Two or More Races 6 2
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Fort scott vs Richmond

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort scott at 4% compared to 2% in Richmond.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Richmond at 90% compared to 87% in Fort scott.
  • Both Fort scott and Richmond have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Richmond has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Fort scott.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fort scott at 6% compared to 2% in Richmond.
  • In Richmond, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fort scott.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort scott Richmond
Mental Health Not Good 18.3% 19.0%
Physical Health Not Good 12.3% 13.6%
Depression 23.2% 26.0%
Smoking 22.8% 23.7%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 17.4%
Obesity 42.7% 37.3%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort scott vs Richmond

  • In Richmond, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.3% in Fort scott.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Richmond at 26.0% versus 23.2% in Fort scott.
  • Richmond has a higher smoking rate at 23.7% compared to 22.8% in Fort scott.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Richmond at 17.4% compared to 16.6% in Fort scott.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fort scott at 42.7% compared to 37.3% in Richmond.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fort scott at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in Richmond.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort scott Richmond
No Schooling 0.4% (30) 0.3% (17)
High School Diploma 13.7% (1,041) 32.1% (1,910)
Less than High School 16.9% (1,285) 15.1% (898)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.5% (1,029) 6.8% (407)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort scott vs Richmond

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort scott have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Richmond.
  • In Richmond, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.1% compared to 13.7% in Fort scott.
  • More residents in Fort scott have less than a high school education at 16.9% compared to 15.1% in Richmond.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort scott hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.5% compared to 6.8% in Richmond.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.