Demographics details for Fort scott, KS vs Logan, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort scott, KS vs Logan, UT.
Data | Fort scott | Logan |
---|---|---|
Population | 7,615 | 54,680 |
Median Age | 38.3 years | 23.7 years |
Median Income | $45,206 | $52,473 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Fort scott vs Logan
- The population in Logan is higher at 54,680, compared to 7,615 in Fort scott.
- Residents in Fort scott have a higher median age of 38.3 years compared to 23.7 years in Logan.
- Logan has a higher median income of $52,473, compared to $45,206 in Fort scott.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Fort scott and Logan at 36.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Logan at 20%, compared to 14% in Fort scott.
- The unemployment rate in Fort scott is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.6% in Logan.
Demographics
Demographics Fort scott vs Logan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort scott | Logan |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 2 |
White | 87 | 73 |
Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
Hispanic | 3 | 14 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort scott vs Logan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort scott at 4% compared to 2% in Logan.
- Fort scott has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 73% in Logan.
- In Logan, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Fort scott.
- Logan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 3% in Fort scott.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Logan at 7%, compared to 6% in Fort scott.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort scott and Logan at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort scott | Logan |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 18.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 13.7% |
Depression | 23.2% | 25.7% |
Smoking | 22.8% | 11.8% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 9.8% |
Obesity | 42.7% | 35.0% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort scott vs Logan
- In Logan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 18.3% in Fort scott.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Logan at 25.7% versus 23.2% in Fort scott.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort scott at 22.8% compared to 11.8% in Logan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort scott at 16.6% compared to 9.8% in Logan.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort scott at 42.7% compared to 35.0% in Logan.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort scott at 21.0% compared to 9.0% in Logan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort scott | Logan |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (30) | 0.9% (488) |
High School Diploma | 13.7% (1,041) | 7.5% (4,106) |
Less than High School | 16.9% (1,285) | 6.4% (3,491) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (1,029) | 16.6% (9,087) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort scott vs Logan
- In Logan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Fort scott.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort scott hold a high school diploma at 13.7% compared to 7.5% in Logan.
- More residents in Fort scott have less than a high school education at 16.9% compared to 6.4% in Logan.
- In Logan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.6% compared to 13.5% in Fort scott.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.