Demographics details for Fort scott, KS vs Laurel, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort scott, KS vs Laurel, MS.
| Data | Fort scott | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,615 | 17,066 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $45,206 | $36,336 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Fort scott vs Laurel
- The population in Laurel is higher at 17,066, compared to 7,615 in Fort scott.
- Residents in Fort scott have a higher median age of 38.3 years compared to 37.6 years in Laurel.
- Fort scott has a higher median income of $45,206 compared to $36,336 in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort scott at 36.0% compared to 29.0% in Laurel.
- The poverty level is higher in Laurel at 20%, compared to 14% in Fort scott.
- Laurel has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 4.5% in Fort scott.
Demographics
Demographics Fort scott vs Laurel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort scott | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 66 |
| White | 87 | 28 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort scott vs Laurel
- In Laurel, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 66% compared to 4% in Fort scott.
- Fort scott has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 28% in Laurel.
- Both Fort scott and Laurel have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Laurel has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Fort scott.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort scott at 6% compared to 1% in Laurel.
- In Laurel, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fort scott.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort scott | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 14.9% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 22.8% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 11.6% |
| Obesity | 42.7% | 44.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort scott vs Laurel
- More residents in Fort scott report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.9% in Laurel.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort scott at 23.2% compared to 21.8% in Laurel.
- Laurel has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 22.8% in Fort scott.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort scott at 16.6% compared to 11.6% in Laurel.
- Laurel has higher obesity rates at 44.5% compared to 42.7% in Fort scott.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort scott at 21.0% compared to 18.0% in Laurel.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort scott | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (30) | 0.7% (124) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (1,041) | 17.3% (2,956) |
| Less than High School | 16.9% (1,285) | 17.5% (2,979) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (1,029) | 14.6% (2,485) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort scott vs Laurel
- In Laurel, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Fort scott.
- In Laurel, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.3% compared to 13.7% in Fort scott.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Laurel at 17.5%, compared to 16.9% in Fort scott.
- In Laurel, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 13.5% in Fort scott.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.