Demographics details for Fort scott, KS vs Gallitzin, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort scott, KS vs Gallitzin, PA.
| Data | Fort scott | Gallitzin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,615 | 1,508 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 39.4 years |
| Median Income | $45,206 | $52,500 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Fort scott vs Gallitzin
- In Fort scott, the population is higher at 7,615, compared to 1,508 in Gallitzin.
- The median age in Gallitzin is higher at 39.4 years, compared to 38.3 years in Fort scott.
- Gallitzin has a higher median income of $52,500, compared to $45,206 in Fort scott.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort scott at 36.0% compared to 32.0% in Gallitzin.
- Fort scott has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 12% in Gallitzin.
- Gallitzin has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Fort scott.
Demographics
Demographics Fort scott vs Gallitzin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort scott | Gallitzin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 87 | 93 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort scott vs Gallitzin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort scott at 4% compared to 0% in Gallitzin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gallitzin at 93% compared to 87% in Fort scott.
- Both Fort scott and Gallitzin have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Fort scott and Gallitzin at 3%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort scott at 6% compared to 4% in Gallitzin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort scott and Gallitzin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort scott | Gallitzin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 25.2% |
| Smoking | 22.8% | 20.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 42.7% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort scott vs Gallitzin
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Fort scott and Gallitzin at 18.3%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gallitzin at 25.2% versus 23.2% in Fort scott.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort scott at 22.8% compared to 20.9% in Gallitzin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gallitzin at 18.5% compared to 16.6% in Fort scott.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort scott at 42.7% compared to 38.6% in Gallitzin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gallitzin at 22.0% compared to 21.0% in Fort scott.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort scott | Gallitzin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (30) | 1.1% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (1,041) | 29.8% (449) |
| Less than High School | 16.9% (1,285) | 20.6% (310) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (1,029) | 9.9% (150) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort scott vs Gallitzin
- In Gallitzin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Fort scott.
- In Gallitzin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.8% compared to 13.7% in Fort scott.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gallitzin at 20.6%, compared to 16.9% in Fort scott.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort scott hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.5% compared to 9.9% in Gallitzin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.