Demographics details for Fort scott, KS vs Fifield, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort scott, KS vs Fifield, WI.
| Data | Fort scott | Fifield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,615 | 879 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 50.0 years |
| Median Income | $45,206 | $50,000 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Fort scott vs Fifield
- In Fort scott, the population is higher at 7,615, compared to 879 in Fifield.
- The median age in Fifield is higher at 50.0 years, compared to 38.3 years in Fort scott.
- Fifield has a higher median income of $50,000, compared to $45,206 in Fort scott.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort scott at 36.0% compared to 20.0% in Fifield.
- Fort scott has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Fifield.
- Fifield has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Fort scott.
Demographics
Demographics Fort scott vs Fifield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort scott | Fifield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 87 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 6 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort scott vs Fifield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort scott at 4% compared to 0% in Fifield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fifield at 100% compared to 87% in Fort scott.
- Both Fort scott and Fifield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort scott at 3% compared to 0% in Fifield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort scott at 6% compared to 0% in Fifield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort scott and Fifield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort scott | Fifield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 23.2% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 22.8% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 42.7% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort scott vs Fifield
- More residents in Fort scott report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort scott at 23.2% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort scott at 22.8% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort scott at 16.6% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort scott at 42.7% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort scott at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort scott | Fifield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (30) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (1,041) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 16.9% (1,285) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (1,029) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort scott vs Fifield
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort scott have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort scott hold a high school diploma at 13.7% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- More residents in Fort scott have less than a high school education at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort scott hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.5% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.