Demographics details for Fort scott, KS vs Douglas, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort scott, KS vs Douglas, NE.
| Data | Fort scott | Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,615 | 171 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 33.4 years |
| Median Income | $45,206 | $65,000 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Fort scott vs Douglas
- In Fort scott, the population is higher at 7,615, compared to 171 in Douglas.
- Residents in Fort scott have a higher median age of 38.3 years compared to 33.4 years in Douglas.
- Douglas has a higher median income of $65,000, compared to $45,206 in Fort scott.
- In Douglas, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 36.0% in Fort scott.
- Fort scott has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 0% in Douglas.
- The unemployment rate in Fort scott is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.5% in Douglas.
Demographics
Demographics Fort scott vs Douglas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort scott | Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 87 | 97 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort scott vs Douglas
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort scott at 4% compared to 0% in Douglas.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Douglas at 97% compared to 87% in Fort scott.
- In Douglas, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Fort scott.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort scott at 3% compared to 0% in Douglas.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort scott at 6% compared to 2% in Douglas.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort scott and Douglas at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort scott | Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 8.3% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 22.8% | 13.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 23.1% |
| Obesity | 42.7% | 36.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort scott vs Douglas
- More residents in Fort scott report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 12.7% in Douglas.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort scott at 23.2% compared to 18.5% in Douglas.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort scott at 22.8% compared to 13.6% in Douglas.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Douglas at 23.1% compared to 16.6% in Fort scott.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort scott at 42.7% compared to 36.8% in Douglas.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort scott at 21.0% compared to 18.0% in Douglas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort scott | Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (30) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (1,041) | 10.5% (18) |
| Less than High School | 16.9% (1,285) | 38.6% (66) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (1,029) | 11.1% (19) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort scott vs Douglas
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort scott have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Douglas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort scott hold a high school diploma at 13.7% compared to 10.5% in Douglas.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Douglas at 38.6%, compared to 16.9% in Fort scott.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort scott hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.5% compared to 11.1% in Douglas.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.