Demographics details for Fort payne, AL vs Westminster, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort payne, AL vs Westminster, CA.
Data | Fort payne | Westminster |
---|---|---|
Population | 14,879 | 89,397 |
Median Age | 39.7 years | 41.6 years |
Median Income | $44,549 | $80,271 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Fort payne vs Westminster
- The population in Westminster is higher at 89,397, compared to 14,879 in Fort payne.
- The median age in Westminster is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 39.7 years in Fort payne.
- Westminster has a higher median income of $80,271, compared to $44,549 in Fort payne.
- In Westminster, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 38.0% in Fort payne.
- The poverty level is identical in both Fort payne and Westminster at 11%.
- Westminster has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 2.5% in Fort payne.
Demographics
Demographics Fort payne vs Westminster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort payne | Westminster |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 1 |
White | 72 | 16 |
Asian | Data is updating | 51 |
Hispanic | 20 | 24 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort payne vs Westminster
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort payne at 2% compared to 1% in Westminster.
- Fort payne has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 16% in Westminster.
- In Westminster, the Asian population stands at 51%, greater than 0% in Fort payne.
- Westminster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 20% in Fort payne.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Westminster at 8%, compared to 4% in Fort payne.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fort payne at 2% compared to 0% in Westminster.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort payne | Westminster |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.2% | 14.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 10.8% |
Depression | 26.0% | 15.3% |
Smoking | 23.3% | 12.5% |
Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 13.0% |
Obesity | 41.8% | 23.4% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort payne vs Westminster
- More residents in Fort payne report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 14.9% in Westminster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort payne at 26.0% compared to 15.3% in Westminster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort payne at 23.3% compared to 12.5% in Westminster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort payne at 14.3% compared to 13.0% in Westminster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort payne at 41.8% compared to 23.4% in Westminster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort payne at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Westminster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort payne | Westminster |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (402) | 4.5% (4,006) |
High School Diploma | 14.2% (2,110) | 16.0% (14,303) |
Less than High School | 27.9% (4,155) | 21.5% (19,217) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (1,767) | 18.5% (16,558) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort payne vs Westminster
- In Westminster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 2.7% in Fort payne.
- In Westminster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 14.2% in Fort payne.
- More residents in Fort payne have less than a high school education at 27.9% compared to 21.5% in Westminster.
- In Westminster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.5% compared to 11.9% in Fort payne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.