Demographics details for Fort payne, AL vs Chino hills, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort payne, AL vs Chino hills, CA.
| Data | Fort payne | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,879 | 77,949 |
| Median Age | 39.7 years | 39.4 years |
| Median Income | $44,549 | $117,548 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fort payne vs Chino hills
- The population in Chino hills is higher at 77,949, compared to 14,879 in Fort payne.
- Residents in Fort payne have a higher median age of 39.7 years compared to 39.4 years in Chino hills.
- Chino hills has a higher median income of $117,548, compared to $44,549 in Fort payne.
- In Chino hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 38.0% in Fort payne.
- Fort payne has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 8% in Chino hills.
- Chino hills has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Fort payne.
Demographics
Demographics Fort payne vs Chino hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort payne | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 4 |
| White | 72 | 14 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 40 |
| Hispanic | 20 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 13 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort payne vs Chino hills
- In Chino hills, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 2% in Fort payne.
- Fort payne has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 14% in Chino hills.
- In Chino hills, the Asian population stands at 40%, greater than 0% in Fort payne.
- Chino hills has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 20% in Fort payne.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chino hills at 13%, compared to 4% in Fort payne.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fort payne at 2% compared to 0% in Chino hills.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort payne | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.2% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 8.0% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 14.6% |
| Smoking | 23.3% | 7.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 41.8% | 28.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort payne vs Chino hills
- More residents in Fort payne report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 12.7% in Chino hills.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort payne at 26.0% compared to 14.6% in Chino hills.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort payne at 23.3% compared to 7.9% in Chino hills.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chino hills at 15.3% compared to 14.3% in Fort payne.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort payne at 41.8% compared to 28.4% in Chino hills.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort payne at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Chino hills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort payne | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (402) | 1.1% (849) |
| High School Diploma | 14.2% (2,110) | 9.6% (7,450) |
| Less than High School | 27.9% (4,155) | 7.2% (5,599) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (1,767) | 34.4% (26,814) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort payne vs Chino hills
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort payne have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.1% in Chino hills.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort payne hold a high school diploma at 14.2% compared to 9.6% in Chino hills.
- More residents in Fort payne have less than a high school education at 27.9% compared to 7.2% in Chino hills.
- In Chino hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.4% compared to 11.9% in Fort payne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.