Demographics details for Fort payne, AL vs Carlisle, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort payne, AL vs Carlisle, IN.
| Data | Fort payne | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,879 | 618 |
| Median Age | 39.7 years | 52.6 years |
| Median Income | $44,549 | $49,250 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Fort payne vs Carlisle
- In Fort payne, the population is higher at 14,879, compared to 618 in Carlisle.
- The median age in Carlisle is higher at 52.6 years, compared to 39.7 years in Fort payne.
- Carlisle has a higher median income of $49,250, compared to $44,549 in Fort payne.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort payne at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Carlisle.
- Fort payne has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 9% in Carlisle.
- Carlisle has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.5% in Fort payne.
Demographics
Demographics Fort payne vs Carlisle provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort payne | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 72 | 93 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 20 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort payne vs Carlisle
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Fort payne and Carlisle at 2%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Carlisle at 93% compared to 72% in Fort payne.
- Both Fort payne and Carlisle have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort payne at 20% compared to 0% in Carlisle.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Carlisle at 5%, compared to 4% in Fort payne.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fort payne at 2% compared to 0% in Carlisle.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort payne | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.2% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 23.3% | 24.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 41.8% | 37.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort payne vs Carlisle
- More residents in Fort payne report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 19.1% in Carlisle.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carlisle at 27.0% versus 26.0% in Fort payne.
- Carlisle has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 23.3% in Fort payne.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Carlisle at 16.7% compared to 14.3% in Fort payne.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort payne at 41.8% compared to 37.0% in Carlisle.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Fort payne and Carlisle at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort payne | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (402) | 0.5% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 14.2% (2,110) | 28.8% (178) |
| Less than High School | 27.9% (4,155) | 3.9% (24) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (1,767) | 6.0% (37) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort payne vs Carlisle
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort payne have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.5% in Carlisle.
- In Carlisle, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.8% compared to 14.2% in Fort payne.
- More residents in Fort payne have less than a high school education at 27.9% compared to 3.9% in Carlisle.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort payne hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 6.0% in Carlisle.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.