Demographics details for Fort morgan, CO vs Stoddard, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort morgan, CO vs Stoddard, WI.
Data | Fort morgan | Stoddard |
---|---|---|
Population | 11,453 | 860 |
Median Age | 32.8 years | 42.1 years |
Median Income | $55,407 | $62,125 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fort morgan vs Stoddard
- In Fort morgan, the population is higher at 11,453, compared to 860 in Stoddard.
- The median age in Stoddard is higher at 42.1 years, compared to 32.8 years in Fort morgan.
- Stoddard has a higher median income of $62,125, compared to $55,407 in Fort morgan.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort morgan at 39.0% compared to 34.0% in Stoddard.
- Fort morgan has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 7% in Stoddard.
- Stoddard has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Fort morgan.
Demographics
Demographics Fort morgan vs Stoddard provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort morgan | Stoddard |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | Data is updating |
White | 16 | 95 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 49 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 23 | 3 |
American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort morgan vs Stoddard
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort morgan at 8% compared to 0% in Stoddard.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Stoddard at 95% compared to 16% in Fort morgan.
- Both Fort morgan and Stoddard have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort morgan at 49% compared to 2% in Stoddard.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort morgan at 23% compared to 3% in Stoddard.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fort morgan at 4% compared to 0% in Stoddard.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort morgan | Stoddard |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 15.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 9.7% |
Depression | 21.7% | 23.6% |
Smoking | 18.7% | 15.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 24.6% |
Obesity | 29.3% | 37.6% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort morgan vs Stoddard
- More residents in Fort morgan report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.1% in Stoddard.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stoddard at 23.6% versus 21.7% in Fort morgan.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort morgan at 18.7% compared to 15.8% in Stoddard.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Stoddard at 24.6% compared to 17.6% in Fort morgan.
- Stoddard has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 29.3% in Fort morgan.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stoddard at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort morgan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort morgan | Stoddard |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 4.3% (496) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 16.0% (1,831) | 21.7% (187) |
Less than High School | 25.8% (2,957) | 6.5% (56) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.5% (1,312) | 11.5% (99) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort morgan vs Stoddard
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort morgan have no formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 0.0% in Stoddard.
- In Stoddard, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 16.0% in Fort morgan.
- More residents in Fort morgan have less than a high school education at 25.8% compared to 6.5% in Stoddard.
- The percentage of residents with a bachelor's degree or higher is identical in both Fort morgan and Stoddard at 11.5%.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.