Demographics details for Fort morgan, CO vs Laurel, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort morgan, CO vs Laurel, MS.
| Data | Fort morgan | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,453 | 17,066 |
| Median Age | 32.8 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $55,407 | $36,336 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Fort morgan vs Laurel
- The population in Laurel is higher at 17,066, compared to 11,453 in Fort morgan.
- The median age in Laurel is higher at 37.6 years, compared to 32.8 years in Fort morgan.
- Fort morgan has a higher median income of $55,407 compared to $36,336 in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort morgan at 39.0% compared to 29.0% in Laurel.
- The poverty level is higher in Laurel at 20%, compared to 11% in Fort morgan.
- Laurel has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 2.5% in Fort morgan.
Demographics
Demographics Fort morgan vs Laurel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort morgan | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 66 |
| White | 16 | 28 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 49 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 23 | 1 |
| American Indian | 4 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort morgan vs Laurel
- In Laurel, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 66% compared to 8% in Fort morgan.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Laurel at 28% compared to 16% in Fort morgan.
- Both Fort morgan and Laurel have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort morgan at 49% compared to 4% in Laurel.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort morgan at 23% compared to 1% in Laurel.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fort morgan at 4% compared to 1% in Laurel.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort morgan | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 14.9% |
| Depression | 21.7% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 18.7% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 11.6% |
| Obesity | 29.3% | 44.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort morgan vs Laurel
- In Laurel, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.0% in Fort morgan.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Laurel at 21.8% versus 21.7% in Fort morgan.
- Laurel has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 18.7% in Fort morgan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort morgan at 17.6% compared to 11.6% in Laurel.
- Laurel has higher obesity rates at 44.5% compared to 29.3% in Fort morgan.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Laurel at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort morgan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort morgan | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.3% (496) | 0.7% (124) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (1,831) | 17.3% (2,956) |
| Less than High School | 25.8% (2,957) | 17.5% (2,979) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.5% (1,312) | 14.6% (2,485) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort morgan vs Laurel
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort morgan have no formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 0.7% in Laurel.
- In Laurel, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.3% compared to 16.0% in Fort morgan.
- More residents in Fort morgan have less than a high school education at 25.8% compared to 17.5% in Laurel.
- In Laurel, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 11.5% in Fort morgan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.