Demographics details for Fort morgan, CO vs Greenbelt, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort morgan, CO vs Greenbelt, MD.
| Data | Fort morgan | Greenbelt |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,453 | 24,360 |
| Median Age | 32.8 years | 37.2 years |
| Median Income | $55,407 | $82,019 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Fort morgan vs Greenbelt
- The population in Greenbelt is higher at 24,360, compared to 11,453 in Fort morgan.
- The median age in Greenbelt is higher at 37.2 years, compared to 32.8 years in Fort morgan.
- Greenbelt has a higher median income of $82,019, compared to $55,407 in Fort morgan.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort morgan at 39.0% compared to 30.0% in Greenbelt.
- Fort morgan has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 9% in Greenbelt.
- Greenbelt has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 2.5% in Fort morgan.
Demographics
Demographics Fort morgan vs Greenbelt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort morgan | Greenbelt |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 48 |
| White | 16 | 17 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 12 |
| Hispanic | 49 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 23 | 6 |
| American Indian | 4 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort morgan vs Greenbelt
- In Greenbelt, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 48% compared to 8% in Fort morgan.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Greenbelt at 17% compared to 16% in Fort morgan.
- In Greenbelt, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 0% in Fort morgan.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort morgan at 49% compared to 16% in Greenbelt.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort morgan at 23% compared to 6% in Greenbelt.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fort morgan at 4% compared to 1% in Greenbelt.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort morgan | Greenbelt |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 12.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 8.1% |
| Depression | 21.7% | 13.0% |
| Smoking | 18.7% | 9.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 12.3% |
| Obesity | 29.3% | 36.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort morgan vs Greenbelt
- More residents in Fort morgan report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 12.9% in Greenbelt.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort morgan at 21.7% compared to 13.0% in Greenbelt.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort morgan at 18.7% compared to 9.8% in Greenbelt.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort morgan at 17.6% compared to 12.3% in Greenbelt.
- Greenbelt has higher obesity rates at 36.0% compared to 29.3% in Fort morgan.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Greenbelt at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort morgan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort morgan | Greenbelt |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.3% (496) | 2.2% (530) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (1,831) | 9.0% (2,195) |
| Less than High School | 25.8% (2,957) | 11.4% (2,766) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.5% (1,312) | 32.2% (7,832) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort morgan vs Greenbelt
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort morgan have no formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 2.2% in Greenbelt.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort morgan hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Greenbelt.
- More residents in Fort morgan have less than a high school education at 25.8% compared to 11.4% in Greenbelt.
- In Greenbelt, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.2% compared to 11.5% in Fort morgan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.