Demographics details for Fort mill, SC vs Wallsburg, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort mill, SC vs Wallsburg, UT.
Data | Fort mill | Wallsburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 30,940 | 297 |
Median Age | 36.7 years | 40.9 years |
Median Income | $128,125 | $99,500 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 53.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Fort mill vs Wallsburg
- In Fort mill, the population is higher at 30,940, compared to 297 in Wallsburg.
- The median age in Wallsburg is higher at 40.9 years, compared to 36.7 years in Fort mill.
- Fort mill has a higher median income of $128,125 compared to $99,500 in Wallsburg.
- In Wallsburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 37.0% in Fort mill.
- Fort mill has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
- The unemployment rate in Fort mill is higher at 4.1%, compared to 2.5% in Wallsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Fort mill vs Wallsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort mill | Wallsburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | Data is updating |
White | 79 | 93 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort mill vs Wallsburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort mill at 9% compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Wallsburg at 93% compared to 79% in Fort mill.
- The Asian population is larger in Fort mill at 3% compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
- Wallsburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 5% in Fort mill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort mill at 4% compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort mill and Wallsburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort mill | Wallsburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 15.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 9.7% |
Depression | 21.1% | 22.8% |
Smoking | 12.3% | 9.1% |
Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 13.2% |
Obesity | 31.6% | 28.0% |
Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort mill vs Wallsburg
- More residents in Fort mill report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 15.3% in Wallsburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Wallsburg at 22.8% versus 21.1% in Fort mill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort mill at 12.3% compared to 9.1% in Wallsburg.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort mill at 18.3% compared to 13.2% in Wallsburg.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort mill at 31.6% compared to 28.0% in Wallsburg.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wallsburg at 11.0% compared to 5.0% in Fort mill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort mill | Wallsburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (78) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 7.7% (2,372) | 27.6% (82) |
Less than High School | 2.8% (879) | 7.4% (22) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.0% (9,271) | 9.4% (28) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort mill vs Wallsburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort mill have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Wallsburg.
- In Wallsburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.6% compared to 7.7% in Fort mill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wallsburg at 7.4%, compared to 2.8% in Fort mill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort mill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.0% compared to 9.4% in Wallsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.