Demographics details for Fort mill, SC vs Superior, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort mill, SC vs Superior, WI.
| Data | Fort mill | Superior |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,940 | 26,459 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 38.7 years |
| Median Income | $128,125 | $54,935 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Fort mill vs Superior
- In Fort mill, the population is higher at 30,940, compared to 26,459 in Superior.
- The median age in Superior is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 36.7 years in Fort mill.
- Fort mill has a higher median income of $128,125 compared to $54,935 in Superior.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort mill at 37.0% compared to 33.0% in Superior.
- The poverty level is higher in Superior at 11%, compared to 5% in Fort mill.
- The unemployment rate in Fort mill is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.8% in Superior.
Demographics
Demographics Fort mill vs Superior provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort mill | Superior |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 2 |
| White | 79 | 87 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort mill vs Superior
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort mill at 9% compared to 2% in Superior.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Superior at 87% compared to 79% in Fort mill.
- The Asian population is larger in Fort mill at 3% compared to 2% in Superior.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort mill at 5% compared to 2% in Superior.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Superior at 5%, compared to 4% in Fort mill.
- In Superior, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Fort mill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort mill | Superior |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 12.3% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 25.5% |
| Obesity | 31.6% | 36.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort mill vs Superior
- In Superior, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 15.4% in Fort mill.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Superior at 24.0% versus 21.1% in Fort mill.
- Superior has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 12.3% in Fort mill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Superior at 25.5% compared to 18.3% in Fort mill.
- Superior has higher obesity rates at 36.9% compared to 31.6% in Fort mill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Superior at 16.0% compared to 5.0% in Fort mill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort mill | Superior |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (78) | 0.6% (149) |
| High School Diploma | 7.7% (2,372) | 17.4% (4,616) |
| Less than High School | 2.8% (879) | 7.6% (2,003) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.0% (9,271) | 19.8% (5,251) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort mill vs Superior
- In Superior, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Fort mill.
- In Superior, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.4% compared to 7.7% in Fort mill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Superior at 7.6%, compared to 2.8% in Fort mill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort mill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.0% compared to 19.8% in Superior.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.