Demographics details for Fort mill, SC vs Sewell, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort mill, SC vs Sewell, NJ.
| Data | Fort mill | Sewell |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,940 | 19,679 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 39.0 years |
| Median Income | $128,125 | $110,000 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Fort mill vs Sewell
- In Fort mill, the population is higher at 30,940, compared to 19,679 in Sewell.
- The median age in Sewell is higher at 39.0 years, compared to 36.7 years in Fort mill.
- Fort mill has a higher median income of $128,125 compared to $110,000 in Sewell.
- In Sewell, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 37.0% in Fort mill.
- The poverty level is identical in both Fort mill and Sewell at 5%.
- The unemployment rate in Fort mill is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.0% in Sewell.
Demographics
Demographics Fort mill vs Sewell provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort mill | Sewell |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 10 |
| White | 79 | 85 |
| Asian | 3 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort mill vs Sewell
- In Sewell, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 9% in Fort mill.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sewell at 85% compared to 79% in Fort mill.
- Both Fort mill and Sewell have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort mill at 5% compared to 2% in Sewell.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort mill at 4% compared to 0% in Sewell.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort mill and Sewell at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort mill | Sewell |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 21.1% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 12.3% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 31.6% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort mill vs Sewell
- More residents in Fort mill report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 0.0% in Sewell.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort mill at 21.1% compared to 0.0% in Sewell.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort mill at 12.3% compared to 0.0% in Sewell.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort mill at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Sewell.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort mill at 31.6% compared to 0.0% in Sewell.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort mill at 5.0% compared to 0.0% in Sewell.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort mill | Sewell |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (78) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 7.7% (2,372) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 2.8% (879) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.0% (9,271) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort mill vs Sewell
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort mill have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Sewell.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort mill hold a high school diploma at 7.7% compared to 0.0% in Sewell.
- More residents in Fort mill have less than a high school education at 2.8% compared to 0.0% in Sewell.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort mill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.0% compared to 0.0% in Sewell.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.