Demographics details for Fort mill, SC vs Provo, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort mill, SC vs Provo, UT.
| Data | Fort mill | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,940 | 113,523 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 23.6 years |
| Median Income | $128,125 | $57,943 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Fort mill vs Provo
- The population in Provo is higher at 113,523, compared to 30,940 in Fort mill.
- Residents in Fort mill have a higher median age of 36.7 years compared to 23.6 years in Provo.
- Fort mill has a higher median income of $128,125 compared to $57,943 in Provo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort mill at 37.0% compared to 36.0% in Provo.
- The poverty level is higher in Provo at 11%, compared to 5% in Fort mill.
- The unemployment rate in Fort mill is higher at 4.1%, compared to 4.0% in Provo.
Demographics
Demographics Fort mill vs Provo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort mill | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 1 |
| White | 79 | 69 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort mill vs Provo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort mill at 9% compared to 1% in Provo.
- Fort mill has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 69% in Provo.
- The Asian population is larger in Fort mill at 3% compared to 2% in Provo.
- Provo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 5% in Fort mill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Provo at 9%, compared to 4% in Fort mill.
- In Provo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fort mill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort mill | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 12.3% | 8.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 7.3% |
| Obesity | 31.6% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort mill vs Provo
- In Provo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.4% in Fort mill.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Provo at 24.5% versus 21.1% in Fort mill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort mill at 12.3% compared to 8.4% in Provo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort mill at 18.3% compared to 7.3% in Provo.
- Provo has higher obesity rates at 33.5% compared to 31.6% in Fort mill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Provo at 10.0% compared to 5.0% in Fort mill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort mill | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (78) | 0.6% (663) |
| High School Diploma | 7.7% (2,372) | 4.6% (5,209) |
| Less than High School | 2.8% (879) | 5.7% (6,435) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.0% (9,271) | 18.3% (20,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort mill vs Provo
- In Provo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Fort mill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort mill hold a high school diploma at 7.7% compared to 4.6% in Provo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Provo at 5.7%, compared to 2.8% in Fort mill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort mill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.0% compared to 18.3% in Provo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.