Demographics details for Fort mill, SC vs Fairmont, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort mill, SC vs Fairmont, NC.
Data | Fort mill | Fairmont |
---|---|---|
Population | 30,940 | 2,188 |
Median Age | 36.7 years | 48.1 years |
Median Income | $128,125 | $31,731 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 22% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Fort mill vs Fairmont
- In Fort mill, the population is higher at 30,940, compared to 2,188 in Fairmont.
- The median age in Fairmont is higher at 48.1 years, compared to 36.7 years in Fort mill.
- Fort mill has a higher median income of $128,125 compared to $31,731 in Fairmont.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort mill at 37.0% compared to 25.0% in Fairmont.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairmont at 22%, compared to 5% in Fort mill.
- Fairmont has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.1% in Fort mill.
Demographics
Demographics Fort mill vs Fairmont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort mill | Fairmont |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 62 |
White | 79 | 14 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 4 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 23 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort mill vs Fairmont
- In Fairmont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 62% compared to 9% in Fort mill.
- Fort mill has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 14% in Fairmont.
- The Asian population is larger in Fort mill at 3% compared to 0% in Fairmont.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort mill at 5% compared to 0% in Fairmont.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort mill at 4% compared to 1% in Fairmont.
- In Fairmont, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 23%, compared to 0% in Fort mill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort mill | Fairmont |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 19.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 16.4% |
Depression | 21.1% | 22.6% |
Smoking | 12.3% | 26.0% |
Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 12.7% |
Obesity | 31.6% | 47.2% |
Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort mill vs Fairmont
- In Fairmont, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 15.4% in Fort mill.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fairmont at 22.6% versus 21.1% in Fort mill.
- Fairmont has a higher smoking rate at 26.0% compared to 12.3% in Fort mill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort mill at 18.3% compared to 12.7% in Fairmont.
- Fairmont has higher obesity rates at 47.2% compared to 31.6% in Fort mill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairmont at 27.0% compared to 5.0% in Fort mill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort mill | Fairmont |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (78) | 0.3% (7) |
High School Diploma | 7.7% (2,372) | 27.5% (602) |
Less than High School | 2.8% (879) | 12.9% (282) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.0% (9,271) | 14.4% (316) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort mill vs Fairmont
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Fort mill and Fairmont at 0.3%.
- In Fairmont, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.5% compared to 7.7% in Fort mill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fairmont at 12.9%, compared to 2.8% in Fort mill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort mill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.0% compared to 14.4% in Fairmont.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.