Demographics details for Fort mill, SC vs Cedar hill, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort mill, SC vs Cedar hill, TX.
Data | Fort mill | Cedar hill |
---|---|---|
Population | 30,940 | 48,341 |
Median Age | 36.7 years | 35.3 years |
Median Income | $128,125 | $84,132 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Fort mill vs Cedar hill
- The population in Cedar hill is higher at 48,341, compared to 30,940 in Fort mill.
- Residents in Fort mill have a higher median age of 36.7 years compared to 35.3 years in Cedar hill.
- Fort mill has a higher median income of $128,125 compared to $84,132 in Cedar hill.
- In Cedar hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 37.0% in Fort mill.
- The poverty level is higher in Cedar hill at 9%, compared to 5% in Fort mill.
- Cedar hill has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.1% in Fort mill.
Demographics
Demographics Fort mill vs Cedar hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort mill | Cedar hill |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 51 |
White | 79 | 11 |
Asian | 3 | 2 |
Hispanic | 5 | 27 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort mill vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 51% compared to 9% in Fort mill.
- Fort mill has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 11% in Cedar hill.
- The Asian population is larger in Fort mill at 3% compared to 2% in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 5% in Fort mill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cedar hill at 9%, compared to 4% in Fort mill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort mill and Cedar hill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort mill | Cedar hill |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 16.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 10.4% |
Depression | 21.1% | 20.5% |
Smoking | 12.3% | 14.8% |
Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 31.6% | 35.9% |
Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort mill vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 15.4% in Fort mill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort mill at 21.1% compared to 20.5% in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 12.3% in Fort mill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort mill at 18.3% compared to 17.7% in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has higher obesity rates at 35.9% compared to 31.6% in Fort mill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cedar hill at 11.0% compared to 5.0% in Fort mill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort mill | Cedar hill |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (78) | 1.2% (578) |
High School Diploma | 7.7% (2,372) | 13.4% (6,465) |
Less than High School | 2.8% (879) | 10.2% (4,909) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.0% (9,271) | 18.4% (8,890) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort mill vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Fort mill.
- In Cedar hill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.4% compared to 7.7% in Fort mill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cedar hill at 10.2%, compared to 2.8% in Fort mill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort mill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.0% compared to 18.4% in Cedar hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.