Demographics details for Fort lupton, CO vs Windham, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort lupton, CO vs Windham, OH.
Data | Fort lupton | Windham |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,829 | 1,664 |
Median Age | 35.9 years | 29.0 years |
Median Income | $71,293 | $39,000 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Fort lupton vs Windham
- In Fort lupton, the population is higher at 8,829, compared to 1,664 in Windham.
- Residents in Fort lupton have a higher median age of 35.9 years compared to 29.0 years in Windham.
- Fort lupton has a higher median income of $71,293 compared to $39,000 in Windham.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort lupton at 34.0% compared to 29.0% in Windham.
- The poverty level is higher in Windham at 12%, compared to 10% in Fort lupton.
- Windham has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Fort lupton.
Demographics
Demographics Fort lupton vs Windham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort lupton | Windham |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 8 |
White | 26 | 84 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 53 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 20 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort lupton vs Windham
- In Windham, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Windham at 84% compared to 26% in Fort lupton.
- Both Fort lupton and Windham have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort lupton at 53% compared to 0% in Windham.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort lupton at 20% compared to 8% in Windham.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fort lupton at 1% compared to 0% in Windham.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort lupton | Windham |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 18.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 13.4% |
Depression | 19.9% | 23.7% |
Smoking | 15.0% | 24.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 18.2% |
Obesity | 30.2% | 37.9% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 29.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort lupton vs Windham
- In Windham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 15.8% in Fort lupton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Windham at 23.7% versus 19.9% in Fort lupton.
- Windham has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 15.0% in Fort lupton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Windham at 18.2% compared to 17.0% in Fort lupton.
- Windham has higher obesity rates at 37.9% compared to 30.2% in Fort lupton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Windham at 29.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort lupton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort lupton | Windham |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (145) | 1.1% (19) |
High School Diploma | 16.2% (1,428) | 27.9% (465) |
Less than High School | 28.0% (2,476) | 18.0% (299) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (622) | 4.3% (71) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort lupton vs Windham
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort lupton have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.1% in Windham.
- In Windham, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.9% compared to 16.2% in Fort lupton.
- More residents in Fort lupton have less than a high school education at 28.0% compared to 18.0% in Windham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort lupton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.0% compared to 4.3% in Windham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.