Demographics details for Fort lupton, CO vs Villas, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort lupton, CO vs Villas, NJ.
| Data | Fort lupton | Villas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,829 | 9,925 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 42.4 years |
| Median Income | $71,293 | $74,182 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Fort lupton vs Villas
- The population in Villas is higher at 9,925, compared to 8,829 in Fort lupton.
- The median age in Villas is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 35.9 years in Fort lupton.
- Villas has a higher median income of $74,182, compared to $71,293 in Fort lupton.
- In Villas, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 34.0% in Fort lupton.
- Fort lupton has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Villas.
- Villas has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Fort lupton.
Demographics
Demographics Fort lupton vs Villas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort lupton | Villas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 26 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 53 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 20 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort lupton vs Villas
- In Villas, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Villas at 88% compared to 26% in Fort lupton.
- In Villas, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Fort lupton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort lupton at 53% compared to 6% in Villas.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort lupton at 20% compared to 6% in Villas.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fort lupton at 1% compared to 0% in Villas.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort lupton | Villas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 25.1% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 30.2% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort lupton vs Villas
- In Villas, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.8% in Fort lupton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Villas at 25.1% versus 19.9% in Fort lupton.
- Villas has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 15.0% in Fort lupton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Villas at 18.9% compared to 17.0% in Fort lupton.
- Villas has higher obesity rates at 34.4% compared to 30.2% in Fort lupton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Villas at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort lupton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort lupton | Villas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (145) | 0.9% (89) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (1,428) | 24.7% (2,455) |
| Less than High School | 28.0% (2,476) | 9.5% (946) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (622) | 17.4% (1,724) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort lupton vs Villas
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort lupton have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.9% in Villas.
- In Villas, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.7% compared to 16.2% in Fort lupton.
- More residents in Fort lupton have less than a high school education at 28.0% compared to 9.5% in Villas.
- In Villas, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 7.0% in Fort lupton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.