Demographics details for Fort lupton, CO vs Maple valley, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort lupton, CO vs Maple valley, WA.

Data Fort lupton Maple valley
Population 8,829 28,220
Median Age 35.9 years 36.4 years
Median Income $71,293 $137,595
Married Families 34.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 10% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.7

Population Comparison: Fort lupton vs Maple valley

  • The population in Maple valley is higher at 28,220, compared to 8,829 in Fort lupton.
  • The median age in Maple valley is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 35.9 years in Fort lupton.
  • Maple valley has a higher median income of $137,595, compared to $71,293 in Fort lupton.
  • In Maple valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 34.0% in Fort lupton.
  • Fort lupton has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Maple valley.
  • Maple valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.5% in Fort lupton.

Demographics

Demographics Fort lupton vs Maple valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort lupton Maple valley
Black Data is updating 2
White 26 74
Asian Data is updating 11
Hispanic 53 5
Two or More Races 20 8
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort lupton vs Maple valley

  • In Maple valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Maple valley at 74% compared to 26% in Fort lupton.
  • In Maple valley, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 0% in Fort lupton.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fort lupton at 53% compared to 5% in Maple valley.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fort lupton at 20% compared to 8% in Maple valley.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fort lupton at 1% compared to 0% in Maple valley.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort lupton Maple valley
Mental Health Not Good 15.8% 15.9%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 8.6%
Depression 19.9% 25.8%
Smoking 15.0% 9.4%
Binge Drinking 17.0% 19.6%
Obesity 30.2% 24.3%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort lupton vs Maple valley

  • In Maple valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 15.8% in Fort lupton.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Maple valley at 25.8% versus 19.9% in Fort lupton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fort lupton at 15.0% compared to 9.4% in Maple valley.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Maple valley at 19.6% compared to 17.0% in Fort lupton.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fort lupton at 30.2% compared to 24.3% in Maple valley.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fort lupton at 12.0% compared to 7.0% in Maple valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort lupton Maple valley
No Schooling 1.6% (145) 0.4% (103)
High School Diploma 16.2% (1,428) 10.2% (2,878)
Less than High School 28.0% (2,476) 3.1% (879)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.0% (622) 28.5% (8,032)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort lupton vs Maple valley

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort lupton have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.4% in Maple valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort lupton hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 10.2% in Maple valley.
  • More residents in Fort lupton have less than a high school education at 28.0% compared to 3.1% in Maple valley.
  • In Maple valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 7.0% in Fort lupton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.