Demographics details for Fort lupton, CO vs Logan, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort lupton, CO vs Logan, UT.
| Data | Fort lupton | Logan |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,829 | 54,680 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 23.7 years |
| Median Income | $71,293 | $52,473 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Fort lupton vs Logan
- The population in Logan is higher at 54,680, compared to 8,829 in Fort lupton.
- Residents in Fort lupton have a higher median age of 35.9 years compared to 23.7 years in Logan.
- Fort lupton has a higher median income of $71,293 compared to $52,473 in Logan.
- In Logan, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 34.0% in Fort lupton.
- The poverty level is higher in Logan at 20%, compared to 10% in Fort lupton.
- Logan has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Fort lupton.
Demographics
Demographics Fort lupton vs Logan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort lupton | Logan |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 26 | 73 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 53 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 20 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort lupton vs Logan
- In Logan, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Logan at 73% compared to 26% in Fort lupton.
- In Logan, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Fort lupton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort lupton at 53% compared to 14% in Logan.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort lupton at 20% compared to 7% in Logan.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fort lupton at 1% compared to 0% in Logan.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort lupton | Logan |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 9.8% |
| Obesity | 30.2% | 35.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort lupton vs Logan
- In Logan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 15.8% in Fort lupton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Logan at 25.7% versus 19.9% in Fort lupton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort lupton at 15.0% compared to 11.8% in Logan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort lupton at 17.0% compared to 9.8% in Logan.
- Logan has higher obesity rates at 35.0% compared to 30.2% in Fort lupton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort lupton at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Logan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort lupton | Logan |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (145) | 0.9% (488) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (1,428) | 7.5% (4,106) |
| Less than High School | 28.0% (2,476) | 6.4% (3,491) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (622) | 16.6% (9,087) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort lupton vs Logan
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort lupton have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.9% in Logan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort lupton hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 7.5% in Logan.
- More residents in Fort lupton have less than a high school education at 28.0% compared to 6.4% in Logan.
- In Logan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.6% compared to 7.0% in Fort lupton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.