Demographics details for Fort lupton, CO vs Hoyt, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort lupton, CO vs Hoyt, KS.
| Data | Fort lupton | Hoyt |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,829 | 589 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $71,293 | $73,750 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 56.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Fort lupton vs Hoyt
- In Fort lupton, the population is higher at 8,829, compared to 589 in Hoyt.
- The median age in Hoyt is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 35.9 years in Fort lupton.
- Hoyt has a higher median income of $73,750, compared to $71,293 in Fort lupton.
- In Hoyt, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 34.0% in Fort lupton.
- Fort lupton has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 7% in Hoyt.
- The unemployment rate in Fort lupton is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Hoyt.
Demographics
Demographics Fort lupton vs Hoyt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort lupton | Hoyt |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 26 | 86 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 53 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 20 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort lupton vs Hoyt
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Fort lupton and Hoyt at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hoyt at 86% compared to 26% in Fort lupton.
- In Hoyt, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Fort lupton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort lupton at 53% compared to 5% in Hoyt.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort lupton at 20% compared to 4% in Hoyt.
- In Hoyt, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 1% in Fort lupton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort lupton | Hoyt |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 17.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 30.2% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort lupton vs Hoyt
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Fort lupton and Hoyt at 15.8%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hoyt at 22.2% versus 19.9% in Fort lupton.
- Hoyt has a higher smoking rate at 17.7% compared to 15.0% in Fort lupton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hoyt at 19.0% compared to 17.0% in Fort lupton.
- Hoyt has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 30.2% in Fort lupton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hoyt at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort lupton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort lupton | Hoyt |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (145) | 0.5% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (1,428) | 26.1% (154) |
| Less than High School | 28.0% (2,476) | 12.6% (74) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (622) | 17.0% (100) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort lupton vs Hoyt
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort lupton have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.5% in Hoyt.
- In Hoyt, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.1% compared to 16.2% in Fort lupton.
- More residents in Fort lupton have less than a high school education at 28.0% compared to 12.6% in Hoyt.
- In Hoyt, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 7.0% in Fort lupton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.