Demographics details for Fort lupton, CO vs Heber springs, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort lupton, CO vs Heber springs, AR.

Data Fort lupton Heber springs
Population 8,829 7,201
Median Age 35.9 years 43.1 years
Median Income $71,293 $50,472
Married Families 34.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.0

Population Comparison: Fort lupton vs Heber springs

  • In Fort lupton, the population is higher at 8,829, compared to 7,201 in Heber springs.
  • The median age in Heber springs is higher at 43.1 years, compared to 35.9 years in Fort lupton.
  • Fort lupton has a higher median income of $71,293 compared to $50,472 in Heber springs.
  • In Heber springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 34.0% in Fort lupton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Heber springs at 12%, compared to 10% in Fort lupton.
  • Heber springs has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Fort lupton.

Demographics

Demographics Fort lupton vs Heber springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort lupton Heber springs
Black Data is updating 1
White 26 92
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 53 3
Two or More Races 20 3
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Fort lupton vs Heber springs

  • In Heber springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Heber springs at 92% compared to 26% in Fort lupton.
  • Both Fort lupton and Heber springs have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fort lupton at 53% compared to 3% in Heber springs.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fort lupton at 20% compared to 3% in Heber springs.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort lupton and Heber springs at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort lupton Heber springs
Mental Health Not Good 15.8% 18.5%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 12.5%
Depression 19.9% 26.3%
Smoking 15.0% 20.5%
Binge Drinking 17.0% 16.2%
Obesity 30.2% 36.2%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort lupton vs Heber springs

  • In Heber springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 15.8% in Fort lupton.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Heber springs at 26.3% versus 19.9% in Fort lupton.
  • Heber springs has a higher smoking rate at 20.5% compared to 15.0% in Fort lupton.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fort lupton at 17.0% compared to 16.2% in Heber springs.
  • Heber springs has higher obesity rates at 36.2% compared to 30.2% in Fort lupton.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Heber springs at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort lupton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort lupton Heber springs
No Schooling 1.6% (145) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.2% (1,428) 23.5% (1,694)
Less than High School 28.0% (2,476) 15.1% (1,088)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.0% (622) 10.5% (756)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort lupton vs Heber springs

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort lupton have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Heber springs.
  • In Heber springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.5% compared to 16.2% in Fort lupton.
  • More residents in Fort lupton have less than a high school education at 28.0% compared to 15.1% in Heber springs.
  • In Heber springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.5% compared to 7.0% in Fort lupton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.