Demographics details for Fort lupton, CO vs Friendship, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort lupton, CO vs Friendship, WI.
| Data | Fort lupton | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,829 | 681 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 50.3 years |
| Median Income | $71,293 | $45,208 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Fort lupton vs Friendship
- In Fort lupton, the population is higher at 8,829, compared to 681 in Friendship.
- The median age in Friendship is higher at 50.3 years, compared to 35.9 years in Fort lupton.
- Fort lupton has a higher median income of $71,293 compared to $45,208 in Friendship.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort lupton at 34.0% compared to 33.0% in Friendship.
- The poverty level is higher in Friendship at 12%, compared to 10% in Fort lupton.
- Friendship has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Fort lupton.
Demographics
Demographics Fort lupton vs Friendship provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort lupton | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 26 | 84 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 53 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 20 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort lupton vs Friendship
- In Friendship, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Friendship at 84% compared to 26% in Fort lupton.
- Both Fort lupton and Friendship have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort lupton at 53% compared to 1% in Friendship.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort lupton at 20% compared to 9% in Friendship.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort lupton and Friendship at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort lupton | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 23.9% |
| Obesity | 30.2% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort lupton vs Friendship
- In Friendship, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.8% in Fort lupton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Friendship at 24.3% versus 19.9% in Fort lupton.
- Friendship has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 15.0% in Fort lupton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 17.0% in Fort lupton.
- Friendship has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 30.2% in Fort lupton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Friendship at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort lupton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort lupton | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (145) | 0.4% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (1,428) | 26.9% (183) |
| Less than High School | 28.0% (2,476) | 26.0% (177) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (622) | 3.2% (22) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort lupton vs Friendship
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort lupton have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.4% in Friendship.
- In Friendship, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 16.2% in Fort lupton.
- More residents in Fort lupton have less than a high school education at 28.0% compared to 26.0% in Friendship.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort lupton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.0% compared to 3.2% in Friendship.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.