Demographics details for Fort lupton, CO vs Edinburg, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort lupton, CO vs Edinburg, TX.
Data | Fort lupton | Edinburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,829 | 104,294 |
Median Age | 35.9 years | 29.9 years |
Median Income | $71,293 | $54,139 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 21% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Fort lupton vs Edinburg
- The population in Edinburg is higher at 104,294, compared to 8,829 in Fort lupton.
- Residents in Fort lupton have a higher median age of 35.9 years compared to 29.9 years in Edinburg.
- Fort lupton has a higher median income of $71,293 compared to $54,139 in Edinburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort lupton at 34.0% compared to 30.0% in Edinburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Edinburg at 21%, compared to 10% in Fort lupton.
- Edinburg has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 3.5% in Fort lupton.
Demographics
Demographics Fort lupton vs Edinburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort lupton | Edinburg |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 2 |
White | 26 | -26 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 53 | 84 |
Two or More Races | 20 | 38 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort lupton vs Edinburg
- In Edinburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
- Fort lupton has a higher percentage of White residents at 26% compared to -26% in Edinburg.
- In Edinburg, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Fort lupton.
- Edinburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 84%, compared to 53% in Fort lupton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Edinburg at 38%, compared to 20% in Fort lupton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fort lupton at 1% compared to 0% in Edinburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort lupton | Edinburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 13.9% |
Depression | 19.9% | 18.3% |
Smoking | 15.0% | 13.9% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 30.2% | 42.7% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort lupton vs Edinburg
- In Edinburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.8% in Fort lupton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort lupton at 19.9% compared to 18.3% in Edinburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort lupton at 15.0% compared to 13.9% in Edinburg.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Fort lupton and Edinburg at 17.0%.
- Edinburg has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 30.2% in Fort lupton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort lupton at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Edinburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort lupton | Edinburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (145) | 1.3% (1,343) |
High School Diploma | 16.2% (1,428) | 10.3% (10,758) |
Less than High School | 28.0% (2,476) | 22.5% (23,503) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (622) | 16.1% (16,818) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort lupton vs Edinburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort lupton have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.3% in Edinburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort lupton hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 10.3% in Edinburg.
- More residents in Fort lupton have less than a high school education at 28.0% compared to 22.5% in Edinburg.
- In Edinburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.1% compared to 7.0% in Fort lupton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.