Demographics details for Fort lupton, CO vs Eddyville, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort lupton, CO vs Eddyville, OR.

Data Fort lupton Eddyville
Population 8,829 942
Median Age 35.9 years 54.6 years
Median Income $71,293 $98,174
Married Families 34.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Fort lupton vs Eddyville

  • In Fort lupton, the population is higher at 8,829, compared to 942 in Eddyville.
  • The median age in Eddyville is higher at 54.6 years, compared to 35.9 years in Fort lupton.
  • Eddyville has a higher median income of $98,174, compared to $71,293 in Fort lupton.
  • In Eddyville, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 34.0% in Fort lupton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Eddyville at 12%, compared to 10% in Fort lupton.
  • Eddyville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Fort lupton.

Demographics

Demographics Fort lupton vs Eddyville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort lupton Eddyville
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 26 76
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 53 9
Two or More Races 20 15
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort lupton vs Eddyville

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Fort lupton and Eddyville at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Eddyville at 76% compared to 26% in Fort lupton.
  • Both Fort lupton and Eddyville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fort lupton at 53% compared to 9% in Eddyville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fort lupton at 20% compared to 15% in Eddyville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fort lupton at 1% compared to 0% in Eddyville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort lupton Eddyville
Mental Health Not Good 15.8% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% Data is updating%
Depression 19.9% Data is updating%
Smoking 15.0% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 17.0% Data is updating%
Obesity 30.2% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort lupton vs Eddyville

  • More residents in Fort lupton report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Eddyville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fort lupton at 19.9% compared to 0.0% in Eddyville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fort lupton at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Eddyville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fort lupton at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Eddyville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fort lupton at 30.2% compared to 0.0% in Eddyville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Eddyville at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort lupton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort lupton Eddyville
No Schooling 1.6% (145) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.2% (1,428) 17.7% (167)
Less than High School 28.0% (2,476) 8.1% (76)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.0% (622) 16.0% (151)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort lupton vs Eddyville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort lupton have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Eddyville.
  • In Eddyville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.7% compared to 16.2% in Fort lupton.
  • More residents in Fort lupton have less than a high school education at 28.0% compared to 8.1% in Eddyville.
  • In Eddyville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Fort lupton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.