Demographics details for Fort leonard wood, MO vs Macclenny, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort leonard wood, MO vs Macclenny, FL.

Data Fort leonard wood Macclenny
Population 15,615 7,670
Median Age 20.6 years 37.5 years
Median Income $64,890 $62,134
Married Families 25.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 11%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 3.5

Population Comparison: Fort leonard wood vs Macclenny

  • In Fort leonard wood, the population is higher at 15,615, compared to 7,670 in Macclenny.
  • The median age in Macclenny is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 20.6 years in Fort leonard wood.
  • Fort leonard wood has a higher median income of $64,890 compared to $62,134 in Macclenny.
  • In Macclenny, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 25.0% in Fort leonard wood.
  • The poverty level is higher in Macclenny at 11%, compared to 0% in Fort leonard wood.
  • Macclenny has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.1% in Fort leonard wood.

Demographics

Demographics Fort leonard wood vs Macclenny provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort leonard wood Macclenny
Black 18 19
White 35 66
Asian 4 1
Hispanic 24 4
Two or More Races 18 9
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Fort leonard wood vs Macclenny

  • In Macclenny, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 18% in Fort leonard wood.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Macclenny at 66% compared to 35% in Fort leonard wood.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fort leonard wood at 4% compared to 1% in Macclenny.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fort leonard wood at 24% compared to 4% in Macclenny.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fort leonard wood at 18% compared to 9% in Macclenny.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort leonard wood and Macclenny at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort leonard wood Macclenny
Mental Health Not Good 21.1% 17.2%
Physical Health Not Good 6.6% 11.2%
Depression 24.0% 20.4%
Smoking 12.8% 22.6%
Binge Drinking 25.4% 17.1%
Obesity 30.7% 36.5%
Disability Percentage 2.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort leonard wood vs Macclenny

  • More residents in Fort leonard wood report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 17.2% in Macclenny.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fort leonard wood at 24.0% compared to 20.4% in Macclenny.
  • Macclenny has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 12.8% in Fort leonard wood.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fort leonard wood at 25.4% compared to 17.1% in Macclenny.
  • Macclenny has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 30.7% in Fort leonard wood.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Macclenny at 14.0% compared to 2.0% in Fort leonard wood.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort leonard wood Macclenny
No Schooling 0.2% (38) 0.1% (4)
High School Diploma 4.5% (700) 17.8% (1,365)
Less than High School 0.8% (119) 13.5% (1,033)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.3% (1,457) 10.4% (799)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort leonard wood vs Macclenny

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort leonard wood have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.1% in Macclenny.
  • In Macclenny, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 4.5% in Fort leonard wood.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Macclenny at 13.5%, compared to 0.8% in Fort leonard wood.
  • In Macclenny, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.4% compared to 9.3% in Fort leonard wood.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.