Demographics details for Fort leonard wood, MO vs Fairmont, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort leonard wood, MO vs Fairmont, NC.
| Data | Fort leonard wood | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,615 | 2,188 |
| Median Age | 20.6 years | 48.1 years |
| Median Income | $64,890 | $31,731 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Fort leonard wood vs Fairmont
- In Fort leonard wood, the population is higher at 15,615, compared to 2,188 in Fairmont.
- The median age in Fairmont is higher at 48.1 years, compared to 20.6 years in Fort leonard wood.
- Fort leonard wood has a higher median income of $64,890 compared to $31,731 in Fairmont.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Fort leonard wood and Fairmont at 25.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairmont at 22%, compared to 0% in Fort leonard wood.
- Fairmont has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.1% in Fort leonard wood.
Demographics
Demographics Fort leonard wood vs Fairmont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort leonard wood | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 62 |
| White | 35 | 14 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 24 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | 23 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort leonard wood vs Fairmont
- In Fairmont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 62% compared to 18% in Fort leonard wood.
- Fort leonard wood has a higher percentage of White residents at 35% compared to 14% in Fairmont.
- The Asian population is larger in Fort leonard wood at 4% compared to 0% in Fairmont.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort leonard wood at 24% compared to 0% in Fairmont.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort leonard wood at 18% compared to 1% in Fairmont.
- In Fairmont, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 23%, compared to 1% in Fort leonard wood.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort leonard wood | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 6.6% | 16.4% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 12.8% | 26.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 25.4% | 12.7% |
| Obesity | 30.7% | 47.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 2.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort leonard wood vs Fairmont
- More residents in Fort leonard wood report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 19.7% in Fairmont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort leonard wood at 24.0% compared to 22.6% in Fairmont.
- Fairmont has a higher smoking rate at 26.0% compared to 12.8% in Fort leonard wood.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort leonard wood at 25.4% compared to 12.7% in Fairmont.
- Fairmont has higher obesity rates at 47.2% compared to 30.7% in Fort leonard wood.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairmont at 27.0% compared to 2.0% in Fort leonard wood.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort leonard wood | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (38) | 0.3% (7) |
| High School Diploma | 4.5% (700) | 27.5% (602) |
| Less than High School | 0.8% (119) | 12.9% (282) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (1,457) | 14.4% (316) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort leonard wood vs Fairmont
- In Fairmont, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in Fort leonard wood.
- In Fairmont, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.5% compared to 4.5% in Fort leonard wood.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fairmont at 12.9%, compared to 0.8% in Fort leonard wood.
- In Fairmont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 9.3% in Fort leonard wood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.