Demographics details for Fort leonard wood, MO vs Columbia, SC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort leonard wood, MO vs Columbia, SC.

Data Fort leonard wood Columbia
Population 15,615 139,698
Median Age 20.6 years 28.3 years
Median Income $64,890 $54,095
Married Families 25.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 17%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 5.8

Population Comparison: Fort leonard wood vs Columbia

  • The population in Columbia is higher at 139,698, compared to 15,615 in Fort leonard wood.
  • The median age in Columbia is higher at 28.3 years, compared to 20.6 years in Fort leonard wood.
  • Fort leonard wood has a higher median income of $64,890 compared to $54,095 in Columbia.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Fort leonard wood and Columbia at 25.0%.
  • The poverty level is higher in Columbia at 17%, compared to 0% in Fort leonard wood.
  • Columbia has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 3.1% in Fort leonard wood.

Demographics

Demographics Fort leonard wood vs Columbia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort leonard wood Columbia
Black 18 40
White 35 48
Asian 4 2
Hispanic 24 5
Two or More Races 18 5
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort leonard wood vs Columbia

  • In Columbia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 18% in Fort leonard wood.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Columbia at 48% compared to 35% in Fort leonard wood.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fort leonard wood at 4% compared to 2% in Columbia.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fort leonard wood at 24% compared to 5% in Columbia.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fort leonard wood at 18% compared to 5% in Columbia.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fort leonard wood at 1% compared to 0% in Columbia.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort leonard wood Columbia
Mental Health Not Good 21.1% 18.6%
Physical Health Not Good 6.6% 13.1%
Depression 24.0% 20.8%
Smoking 12.8% 19.1%
Binge Drinking 25.4% 18.1%
Obesity 30.7% 39.0%
Disability Percentage 2.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort leonard wood vs Columbia

  • More residents in Fort leonard wood report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 18.6% in Columbia.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fort leonard wood at 24.0% compared to 20.8% in Columbia.
  • Columbia has a higher smoking rate at 19.1% compared to 12.8% in Fort leonard wood.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fort leonard wood at 25.4% compared to 18.1% in Columbia.
  • Columbia has higher obesity rates at 39.0% compared to 30.7% in Fort leonard wood.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Columbia at 11.0% compared to 2.0% in Fort leonard wood.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort leonard wood Columbia
No Schooling 0.2% (38) 0.4% (555)
High School Diploma 4.5% (700) 8.4% (11,712)
Less than High School 0.8% (119) 5.9% (8,257)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.3% (1,457) 24.7% (34,575)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort leonard wood vs Columbia

  • In Columbia, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Fort leonard wood.
  • In Columbia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 8.4% compared to 4.5% in Fort leonard wood.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Columbia at 5.9%, compared to 0.8% in Fort leonard wood.
  • In Columbia, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 9.3% in Fort leonard wood.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.