Demographics details for Fort lauderdale, FL vs Shrub oak, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort lauderdale, FL vs Shrub oak, NY.

Data Fort lauderdale Shrub oak
Population 183,146 3,002
Median Age 43.2 years 36.6 years
Median Income $75,376 $128,832
Married Families 33.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 12% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Fort lauderdale vs Shrub oak

  • In Fort lauderdale, the population is higher at 183,146, compared to 3,002 in Shrub oak.
  • Residents in Fort lauderdale have a higher median age of 43.2 years compared to 36.6 years in Shrub oak.
  • Shrub oak has a higher median income of $128,832, compared to $75,376 in Fort lauderdale.
  • In Shrub oak, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 33.0% in Fort lauderdale.
  • Fort lauderdale has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Shrub oak.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Fort lauderdale and Shrub oak at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Fort lauderdale vs Shrub oak provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort lauderdale Shrub oak
Black 29 2
White 38 64
Asian 2 15
Hispanic 20 18
Two or More Races 11 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort lauderdale vs Shrub oak

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort lauderdale at 29% compared to 2% in Shrub oak.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Shrub oak at 64% compared to 38% in Fort lauderdale.
  • In Shrub oak, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 2% in Fort lauderdale.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fort lauderdale at 20% compared to 18% in Shrub oak.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fort lauderdale at 11% compared to 1% in Shrub oak.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort lauderdale and Shrub oak at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort lauderdale Shrub oak
Mental Health Not Good 15.6% 13.2%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 8.2%
Depression 17.3% 19.7%
Smoking 18.0% 11.3%
Binge Drinking 15.4% 18.1%
Obesity 29.8% 25.7%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort lauderdale vs Shrub oak

  • More residents in Fort lauderdale report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 13.2% in Shrub oak.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Shrub oak at 19.7% versus 17.3% in Fort lauderdale.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fort lauderdale at 18.0% compared to 11.3% in Shrub oak.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Shrub oak at 18.1% compared to 15.4% in Fort lauderdale.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fort lauderdale at 29.8% compared to 25.7% in Shrub oak.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Fort lauderdale and Shrub oak at 11.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort lauderdale Shrub oak
No Schooling 1.1% (1,998) 0.4% (13)
High School Diploma 16.0% (29,393) 11.0% (330)
Less than High School 11.8% (21,537) 12.9% (387)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 30.5% (55,791) 38.9% (1,168)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort lauderdale vs Shrub oak

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort lauderdale have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Shrub oak.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort lauderdale hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Shrub oak.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shrub oak at 12.9%, compared to 11.8% in Fort lauderdale.
  • In Shrub oak, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 30.5% in Fort lauderdale.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.