Demographics details for Fort lauderdale, FL vs Park forest, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort lauderdale, FL vs Park forest, IL.

Data Fort lauderdale Park forest
Population 183,146 20,954
Median Age 43.2 years 37.4 years
Median Income $75,376 $58,907
Married Families 33.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level 12% 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 8.9

Population Comparison: Fort lauderdale vs Park forest

  • In Fort lauderdale, the population is higher at 183,146, compared to 20,954 in Park forest.
  • Residents in Fort lauderdale have a higher median age of 43.2 years compared to 37.4 years in Park forest.
  • Fort lauderdale has a higher median income of $75,376 compared to $58,907 in Park forest.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort lauderdale at 33.0% compared to 25.0% in Park forest.
  • The poverty level is higher in Park forest at 13%, compared to 12% in Fort lauderdale.
  • Park forest has a higher unemployment rate at 8.9% compared to 3.5% in Fort lauderdale.

Demographics

Demographics Fort lauderdale vs Park forest provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort lauderdale Park forest
Black 29 72
White 38 17
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 20 7
Two or More Races 11 3
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Fort lauderdale vs Park forest

  • In Park forest, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 72% compared to 29% in Fort lauderdale.
  • Fort lauderdale has a higher percentage of White residents at 38% compared to 17% in Park forest.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fort lauderdale at 2% compared to 0% in Park forest.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fort lauderdale at 20% compared to 7% in Park forest.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fort lauderdale at 11% compared to 3% in Park forest.
  • In Park forest, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fort lauderdale.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort lauderdale Park forest
Mental Health Not Good 15.6% 15.5%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 11.2%
Depression 17.3% 16.9%
Smoking 18.0% 15.9%
Binge Drinking 15.4% 15.8%
Obesity 29.8% 37.2%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort lauderdale vs Park forest

  • More residents in Fort lauderdale report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 15.5% in Park forest.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fort lauderdale at 17.3% compared to 16.9% in Park forest.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fort lauderdale at 18.0% compared to 15.9% in Park forest.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Park forest at 15.8% compared to 15.4% in Fort lauderdale.
  • Park forest has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 29.8% in Fort lauderdale.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Park forest at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Fort lauderdale.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort lauderdale Park forest
No Schooling 1.1% (1,998) 2.4% (503)
High School Diploma 16.0% (29,393) 13.4% (2,802)
Less than High School 11.8% (21,537) 8.5% (1,787)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 30.5% (55,791) 17.4% (3,650)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort lauderdale vs Park forest

  • In Park forest, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.1% in Fort lauderdale.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort lauderdale hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 13.4% in Park forest.
  • More residents in Fort lauderdale have less than a high school education at 11.8% compared to 8.5% in Park forest.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort lauderdale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.5% compared to 17.4% in Park forest.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.