Demographics details for Fort lauderdale, FL vs Pana, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort lauderdale, FL vs Pana, IL.
Data | Fort lauderdale | Pana |
---|---|---|
Population | 183,146 | 5,093 |
Median Age | 43.2 years | 41.7 years |
Median Income | $75,376 | $47,763 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Fort lauderdale vs Pana
- In Fort lauderdale, the population is higher at 183,146, compared to 5,093 in Pana.
- Residents in Fort lauderdale have a higher median age of 43.2 years compared to 41.7 years in Pana.
- Fort lauderdale has a higher median income of $75,376 compared to $47,763 in Pana.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort lauderdale at 33.0% compared to 32.0% in Pana.
- Fort lauderdale has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Pana.
- Pana has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Fort lauderdale.
Demographics
Demographics Fort lauderdale vs Pana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort lauderdale | Pana |
---|---|---|
Black | 29 | Data is updating |
White | 38 | 93 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 20 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort lauderdale vs Pana
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort lauderdale at 29% compared to 0% in Pana.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pana at 93% compared to 38% in Fort lauderdale.
- The Asian population is larger in Fort lauderdale at 2% compared to 1% in Pana.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort lauderdale at 20% compared to 3% in Pana.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort lauderdale at 11% compared to 3% in Pana.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort lauderdale and Pana at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort lauderdale | Pana |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 17.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 12.5% |
Depression | 17.3% | 22.8% |
Smoking | 18.0% | 21.3% |
Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 17.5% |
Obesity | 29.8% | 39.1% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort lauderdale vs Pana
- In Pana, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.6% in Fort lauderdale.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pana at 22.8% versus 17.3% in Fort lauderdale.
- Pana has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 18.0% in Fort lauderdale.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pana at 17.5% compared to 15.4% in Fort lauderdale.
- Pana has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 29.8% in Fort lauderdale.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pana at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Fort lauderdale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort lauderdale | Pana |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (1,998) | 0.4% (21) |
High School Diploma | 16.0% (29,393) | 30.7% (1,563) |
Less than High School | 11.8% (21,537) | 17.1% (870) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.5% (55,791) | 11.0% (559) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort lauderdale vs Pana
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort lauderdale have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Pana.
- In Pana, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.7% compared to 16.0% in Fort lauderdale.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pana at 17.1%, compared to 11.8% in Fort lauderdale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort lauderdale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.5% compared to 11.0% in Pana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.