Demographics details for Fort lauderdale, FL vs Girdletree, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort lauderdale, FL vs Girdletree, MD.

Data Fort lauderdale Girdletree
Population 183,146 122
Median Age 43.2 years 57.4 years
Median Income $75,376 $129,167
Married Families 33.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level 12% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.5 Data is updating

Population Comparison: Fort lauderdale vs Girdletree

  • In Fort lauderdale, the population is higher at 183,146, compared to 122 in Girdletree.
  • The median age in Girdletree is higher at 57.4 years, compared to 43.2 years in Fort lauderdale.
  • Girdletree has a higher median income of $129,167, compared to $75,376 in Fort lauderdale.
  • In Girdletree, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 33.0% in Fort lauderdale.
  • Fort lauderdale has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Girdletree.
  • The unemployment rate in Fort lauderdale is higher at 3.5%, compared to 0.0% in Girdletree.

Demographics

Demographics Fort lauderdale vs Girdletree provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort lauderdale Girdletree
Black 29 Data is updating
White 38 89
Asian 2 11
Hispanic 20 Data is updating
Two or More Races 11 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort lauderdale vs Girdletree

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort lauderdale at 29% compared to 0% in Girdletree.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Girdletree at 89% compared to 38% in Fort lauderdale.
  • In Girdletree, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 2% in Fort lauderdale.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fort lauderdale at 20% compared to 0% in Girdletree.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fort lauderdale at 11% compared to 0% in Girdletree.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort lauderdale and Girdletree at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort lauderdale Girdletree
Mental Health Not Good 15.6% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 10.6%
Depression 17.3% 20.8%
Smoking 18.0% 18.7%
Binge Drinking 15.4% 18.8%
Obesity 29.8% 39.6%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort lauderdale vs Girdletree

  • In Girdletree, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 15.6% in Fort lauderdale.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Girdletree at 20.8% versus 17.3% in Fort lauderdale.
  • Girdletree has a higher smoking rate at 18.7% compared to 18.0% in Fort lauderdale.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Girdletree at 18.8% compared to 15.4% in Fort lauderdale.
  • Girdletree has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 29.8% in Fort lauderdale.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fort lauderdale at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Girdletree.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort lauderdale Girdletree
No Schooling 1.1% (1,998) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.0% (29,393) 44.3% (54)
Less than High School 11.8% (21,537) 19.7% (24)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 30.5% (55,791) 5.7% (7)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort lauderdale vs Girdletree

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort lauderdale have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Girdletree.
  • In Girdletree, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 44.3% compared to 16.0% in Fort lauderdale.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Girdletree at 19.7%, compared to 11.8% in Fort lauderdale.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort lauderdale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.5% compared to 5.7% in Girdletree.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.