Demographics details for Fort lauderdale, FL vs Beaver dam, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort lauderdale, FL vs Beaver dam, WI.

Data Fort lauderdale Beaver dam
Population 183,146 16,582
Median Age 43.2 years 40.4 years
Median Income $75,376 $65,802
Married Families 33.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 12% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.1

Population Comparison: Fort lauderdale vs Beaver dam

  • In Fort lauderdale, the population is higher at 183,146, compared to 16,582 in Beaver dam.
  • Residents in Fort lauderdale have a higher median age of 43.2 years compared to 40.4 years in Beaver dam.
  • Fort lauderdale has a higher median income of $75,376 compared to $65,802 in Beaver dam.
  • In Beaver dam, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 33.0% in Fort lauderdale.
  • Fort lauderdale has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
  • The unemployment rate in Fort lauderdale is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.

Demographics

Demographics Fort lauderdale vs Beaver dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort lauderdale Beaver dam
Black 29 3
White 38 81
Asian 2 2
Hispanic 20 8
Two or More Races 11 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort lauderdale vs Beaver dam

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort lauderdale at 29% compared to 3% in Beaver dam.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Beaver dam at 81% compared to 38% in Fort lauderdale.
  • Both Fort lauderdale and Beaver dam have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fort lauderdale at 20% compared to 8% in Beaver dam.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fort lauderdale at 11% compared to 6% in Beaver dam.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort lauderdale and Beaver dam at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort lauderdale Beaver dam
Mental Health Not Good 15.6% 15.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 10.6%
Depression 17.3% 23.6%
Smoking 18.0% 17.6%
Binge Drinking 15.4% 23.5%
Obesity 29.8% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort lauderdale vs Beaver dam

  • In Beaver dam, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 15.6% in Fort lauderdale.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Beaver dam at 23.6% versus 17.3% in Fort lauderdale.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fort lauderdale at 18.0% compared to 17.6% in Beaver dam.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 15.4% in Fort lauderdale.
  • Beaver dam has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 29.8% in Fort lauderdale.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Fort lauderdale and Beaver dam at 11.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort lauderdale Beaver dam
No Schooling 1.1% (1,998) 0.3% (47)
High School Diploma 16.0% (29,393) 23.8% (3,947)
Less than High School 11.8% (21,537) 10.3% (1,706)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 30.5% (55,791) 18.2% (3,023)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort lauderdale vs Beaver dam

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort lauderdale have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.3% in Beaver dam.
  • In Beaver dam, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.8% compared to 16.0% in Fort lauderdale.
  • More residents in Fort lauderdale have less than a high school education at 11.8% compared to 10.3% in Beaver dam.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort lauderdale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.5% compared to 18.2% in Beaver dam.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.