Demographics details for Fort dodge, IA vs Yuma, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort dodge, IA vs Yuma, AZ.
| Data | Fort dodge | Yuma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,657 | 98,527 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 32.0 years |
| Median Income | $59,452 | $59,312 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 9.0 |
Population Comparison: Fort dodge vs Yuma
- The population in Yuma is higher at 98,527, compared to 24,657 in Fort dodge.
- Residents in Fort dodge have a higher median age of 37.2 years compared to 32.0 years in Yuma.
- Fort dodge has a higher median income of $59,452 compared to $59,312 in Yuma.
- In Yuma, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 31.0% in Fort dodge.
- The poverty level is higher in Yuma at 18%, compared to 0% in Fort dodge.
- Yuma has a higher unemployment rate at 9.0% compared to 3.5% in Fort dodge.
Demographics
Demographics Fort dodge vs Yuma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort dodge | Yuma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 2 |
| White | 79 | 13 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 61 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 21 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort dodge vs Yuma
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort dodge at 5% compared to 2% in Yuma.
- Fort dodge has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 13% in Yuma.
- Both Fort dodge and Yuma have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Yuma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 61%, compared to 7% in Fort dodge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Yuma at 21%, compared to 7% in Fort dodge.
- In Yuma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fort dodge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort dodge | Yuma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 19.3% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 16.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.2% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort dodge vs Yuma
- In Yuma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.6% in Fort dodge.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 19.3%.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort dodge at 20.1% compared to 16.2% in Yuma.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort dodge at 21.2% compared to 17.6% in Yuma.
- Yuma has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 35.0% in Fort dodge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort dodge at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Yuma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort dodge | Yuma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (163) | 1.7% (1,642) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (4,633) | 13.2% (13,054) |
| Less than High School | 12.2% (2,998) | 19.8% (19,520) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.8% (3,403) | 12.3% (12,116) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort dodge vs Yuma
- In Yuma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.7% in Fort dodge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort dodge hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 13.2% in Yuma.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Yuma at 19.8%, compared to 12.2% in Fort dodge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort dodge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.8% compared to 12.3% in Yuma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.