Demographics details for Fort dodge, IA vs Wickliffe, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort dodge, IA vs Wickliffe, OH.
| Data | Fort dodge | Wickliffe |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,657 | 12,610 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 43.7 years |
| Median Income | $59,452 | $76,938 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Fort dodge vs Wickliffe
- In Fort dodge, the population is higher at 24,657, compared to 12,610 in Wickliffe.
- The median age in Wickliffe is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 37.2 years in Fort dodge.
- Wickliffe has a higher median income of $76,938, compared to $59,452 in Fort dodge.
- In Wickliffe, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 31.0% in Fort dodge.
- The poverty level is higher in Wickliffe at 5%, compared to 0% in Fort dodge.
- Wickliffe has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Fort dodge.
Demographics
Demographics Fort dodge vs Wickliffe provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort dodge | Wickliffe |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 6 |
| White | 79 | 85 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort dodge vs Wickliffe
- In Wickliffe, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 5% in Fort dodge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Wickliffe at 85% compared to 79% in Fort dodge.
- Both Fort dodge and Wickliffe have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort dodge at 7% compared to 2% in Wickliffe.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort dodge at 7% compared to 5% in Wickliffe.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort dodge and Wickliffe at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort dodge | Wickliffe |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 18.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.2% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 36.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort dodge vs Wickliffe
- In Wickliffe, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 16.6% in Fort dodge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Wickliffe at 22.3% versus 19.3% in Fort dodge.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort dodge at 20.1% compared to 18.1% in Wickliffe.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort dodge at 21.2% compared to 19.4% in Wickliffe.
- Wickliffe has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 35.0% in Fort dodge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort dodge at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Wickliffe.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort dodge | Wickliffe |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (163) | 0.3% (32) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (4,633) | 22.8% (2,877) |
| Less than High School | 12.2% (2,998) | 8.3% (1,049) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.8% (3,403) | 18.5% (2,331) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort dodge vs Wickliffe
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort dodge have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Wickliffe.
- In Wickliffe, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.8% compared to 18.8% in Fort dodge.
- More residents in Fort dodge have less than a high school education at 12.2% compared to 8.3% in Wickliffe.
- In Wickliffe, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.5% compared to 13.8% in Fort dodge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.