Demographics details for Fort dodge, IA vs Sikeston, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort dodge, IA vs Sikeston, MO.
| Data | Fort dodge | Sikeston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,657 | 16,073 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $59,452 | $47,464 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Fort dodge vs Sikeston
- In Fort dodge, the population is higher at 24,657, compared to 16,073 in Sikeston.
- The median age in Sikeston is higher at 37.3 years, compared to 37.2 years in Fort dodge.
- Fort dodge has a higher median income of $59,452 compared to $47,464 in Sikeston.
- In Sikeston, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 31.0% in Fort dodge.
- The poverty level is higher in Sikeston at 16%, compared to 0% in Fort dodge.
- The unemployment rate in Fort dodge is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.4% in Sikeston.
Demographics
Demographics Fort dodge vs Sikeston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort dodge | Sikeston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 25 |
| White | 79 | 65 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort dodge vs Sikeston
- In Sikeston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 5% in Fort dodge.
- Fort dodge has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 65% in Sikeston.
- The Asian population is larger in Fort dodge at 2% compared to 0% in Sikeston.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort dodge at 7% compared to 3% in Sikeston.
- Both Fort dodge and Sikeston have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 7%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort dodge and Sikeston at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort dodge | Sikeston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 19.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 23.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.2% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 39.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort dodge vs Sikeston
- In Sikeston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 16.6% in Fort dodge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sikeston at 24.6% versus 19.3% in Fort dodge.
- Sikeston has a higher smoking rate at 23.9% compared to 20.1% in Fort dodge.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort dodge at 21.2% compared to 15.8% in Sikeston.
- Sikeston has higher obesity rates at 39.0% compared to 35.0% in Fort dodge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sikeston at 20.0% compared to 15.0% in Fort dodge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort dodge | Sikeston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (163) | 0.5% (76) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (4,633) | 23.0% (3,696) |
| Less than High School | 12.2% (2,998) | 13.3% (2,142) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.8% (3,403) | 16.3% (2,619) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort dodge vs Sikeston
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort dodge have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Sikeston.
- In Sikeston, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.0% compared to 18.8% in Fort dodge.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sikeston at 13.3%, compared to 12.2% in Fort dodge.
- In Sikeston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 13.8% in Fort dodge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.