Demographics details for Fort dodge, IA vs Rutherford, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort dodge, IA vs Rutherford, NJ.
| Data | Fort dodge | Rutherford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,657 | 18,662 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 40.5 years |
| Median Income | $59,452 | $128,576 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Fort dodge vs Rutherford
- In Fort dodge, the population is higher at 24,657, compared to 18,662 in Rutherford.
- The median age in Rutherford is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 37.2 years in Fort dodge.
- Rutherford has a higher median income of $128,576, compared to $59,452 in Fort dodge.
- In Rutherford, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 31.0% in Fort dodge.
- The poverty level is higher in Rutherford at 9%, compared to 0% in Fort dodge.
- The unemployment rate in Fort dodge is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.4% in Rutherford.
Demographics
Demographics Fort dodge vs Rutherford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort dodge | Rutherford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 3 |
| White | 79 | 49 |
| Asian | 2 | 16 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort dodge vs Rutherford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort dodge at 5% compared to 3% in Rutherford.
- Fort dodge has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 49% in Rutherford.
- In Rutherford, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 2% in Fort dodge.
- Rutherford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 7% in Fort dodge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rutherford at 11%, compared to 7% in Fort dodge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort dodge and Rutherford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort dodge | Rutherford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 7.8% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 10.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.2% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 24.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort dodge vs Rutherford
- More residents in Fort dodge report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 13.2% in Rutherford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort dodge at 19.3% compared to 17.0% in Rutherford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort dodge at 20.1% compared to 10.8% in Rutherford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort dodge at 21.2% compared to 17.6% in Rutherford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort dodge at 35.0% compared to 24.9% in Rutherford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort dodge at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Rutherford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort dodge | Rutherford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (163) | 0.9% (161) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (4,633) | 12.4% (2,318) |
| Less than High School | 12.2% (2,998) | 6.3% (1,175) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.8% (3,403) | 38.9% (7,259) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort dodge vs Rutherford
- In Rutherford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Fort dodge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort dodge hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 12.4% in Rutherford.
- More residents in Fort dodge have less than a high school education at 12.2% compared to 6.3% in Rutherford.
- In Rutherford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 13.8% in Fort dodge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.