Demographics details for Fort dodge, IA vs Oakland park, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort dodge, IA vs Oakland park, FL.
Data | Fort dodge | Oakland park |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,657 | 43,824 |
Median Age | 37.2 years | 39.1 years |
Median Income | $59,452 | $64,989 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Fort dodge vs Oakland park
- The population in Oakland park is higher at 43,824, compared to 24,657 in Fort dodge.
- The median age in Oakland park is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 37.2 years in Fort dodge.
- Oakland park has a higher median income of $64,989, compared to $59,452 in Fort dodge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort dodge at 31.0% compared to 30.0% in Oakland park.
- The poverty level is higher in Oakland park at 14%, compared to 0% in Fort dodge.
- The unemployment rate in Fort dodge is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.1% in Oakland park.
Demographics
Demographics Fort dodge vs Oakland park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort dodge | Oakland park |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 29 |
White | 79 | 20 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 7 | 32 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 17 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort dodge vs Oakland park
- In Oakland park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 5% in Fort dodge.
- Fort dodge has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 20% in Oakland park.
- Both Fort dodge and Oakland park have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Oakland park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 7% in Fort dodge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Oakland park at 17%, compared to 7% in Fort dodge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort dodge and Oakland park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort dodge | Oakland park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 12.2% |
Depression | 19.3% | 17.8% |
Smoking | 20.1% | 20.1% |
Binge Drinking | 21.2% | 15.0% |
Obesity | 35.0% | 31.1% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort dodge vs Oakland park
- More residents in Fort dodge report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 16.3% in Oakland park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort dodge at 19.3% compared to 17.8% in Oakland park.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Fort dodge and Oakland park at 20.1%.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort dodge at 21.2% compared to 15.0% in Oakland park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort dodge at 35.0% compared to 31.1% in Oakland park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort dodge at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Oakland park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort dodge | Oakland park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (163) | 1.4% (596) |
High School Diploma | 18.8% (4,633) | 19.8% (8,695) |
Less than High School | 12.2% (2,998) | 16.2% (7,092) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.8% (3,403) | 20.7% (9,073) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort dodge vs Oakland park
- In Oakland park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.7% in Fort dodge.
- In Oakland park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.8% compared to 18.8% in Fort dodge.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Oakland park at 16.2%, compared to 12.2% in Fort dodge.
- In Oakland park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 13.8% in Fort dodge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.