Demographics details for Fort dodge, IA vs Cross city, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort dodge, IA vs Cross city, FL.
Data | Fort dodge | Cross city |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,657 | 1,754 |
Median Age | 37.2 years | 40.2 years |
Median Income | $59,452 | $44,500 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 47.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fort dodge vs Cross city
- In Fort dodge, the population is higher at 24,657, compared to 1,754 in Cross city.
- The median age in Cross city is higher at 40.2 years, compared to 37.2 years in Fort dodge.
- Fort dodge has a higher median income of $59,452 compared to $44,500 in Cross city.
- In Cross city, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 31.0% in Fort dodge.
- The poverty level is higher in Cross city at 18%, compared to 0% in Fort dodge.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Fort dodge and Cross city at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Fort dodge vs Cross city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort dodge | Cross city |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 20 |
White | 79 | 61 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 7 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort dodge vs Cross city
- In Cross city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 5% in Fort dodge.
- Fort dodge has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 61% in Cross city.
- Both Fort dodge and Cross city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Cross city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 7% in Fort dodge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cross city at 8%, compared to 7% in Fort dodge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort dodge and Cross city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort dodge | Cross city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 20.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 15.8% |
Depression | 19.3% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 20.1% | 29.1% |
Binge Drinking | 21.2% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 35.0% | 40.8% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 32.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort dodge vs Cross city
- In Cross city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 16.6% in Fort dodge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cross city at 23.8% versus 19.3% in Fort dodge.
- Cross city has a higher smoking rate at 29.1% compared to 20.1% in Fort dodge.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort dodge at 21.2% compared to 14.8% in Cross city.
- Cross city has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 35.0% in Fort dodge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cross city at 32.0% compared to 15.0% in Fort dodge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort dodge | Cross city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (163) | 0.9% (15) |
High School Diploma | 18.8% (4,633) | 39.2% (688) |
Less than High School | 12.2% (2,998) | 11.7% (205) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.8% (3,403) | 7.8% (136) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort dodge vs Cross city
- In Cross city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Fort dodge.
- In Cross city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 39.2% compared to 18.8% in Fort dodge.
- More residents in Fort dodge have less than a high school education at 12.2% compared to 11.7% in Cross city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort dodge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.8% compared to 7.8% in Cross city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.