Demographics details for Fort dodge, IA vs Cleveland, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort dodge, IA vs Cleveland, MS.
| Data | Fort dodge | Cleveland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,657 | 10,545 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 33.8 years |
| Median Income | $59,452 | $42,005 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 24% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Fort dodge vs Cleveland
- In Fort dodge, the population is higher at 24,657, compared to 10,545 in Cleveland.
- Residents in Fort dodge have a higher median age of 37.2 years compared to 33.8 years in Cleveland.
- Fort dodge has a higher median income of $59,452 compared to $42,005 in Cleveland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort dodge at 31.0% compared to 27.0% in Cleveland.
- The poverty level is higher in Cleveland at 24%, compared to 0% in Fort dodge.
- Cleveland has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 3.5% in Fort dodge.
Demographics
Demographics Fort dodge vs Cleveland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort dodge | Cleveland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 56 |
| White | 79 | 36 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort dodge vs Cleveland
- In Cleveland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 56% compared to 5% in Fort dodge.
- Fort dodge has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 36% in Cleveland.
- Both Fort dodge and Cleveland have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort dodge at 7% compared to 1% in Cleveland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort dodge at 7% compared to 5% in Cleveland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort dodge and Cleveland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort dodge | Cleveland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 21.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.2% | 12.7% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 41.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort dodge vs Cleveland
- In Cleveland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.6% in Fort dodge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cleveland at 20.4% versus 19.3% in Fort dodge.
- Cleveland has a higher smoking rate at 21.0% compared to 20.1% in Fort dodge.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort dodge at 21.2% compared to 12.7% in Cleveland.
- Cleveland has higher obesity rates at 41.4% compared to 35.0% in Fort dodge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cleveland at 20.0% compared to 15.0% in Fort dodge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort dodge | Cleveland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (163) | 0.9% (99) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (4,633) | 10.0% (1,059) |
| Less than High School | 12.2% (2,998) | 13.3% (1,404) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.8% (3,403) | 21.3% (2,242) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort dodge vs Cleveland
- In Cleveland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Fort dodge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort dodge hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 10.0% in Cleveland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cleveland at 13.3%, compared to 12.2% in Fort dodge.
- In Cleveland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 13.8% in Fort dodge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.