Demographics details for Fort calhoun, NE vs Suffolk, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort calhoun, NE vs Suffolk, VA.
| Data | Fort calhoun | Suffolk |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,115 | 98,537 |
| Median Age | 44.1 years | 38.5 years |
| Median Income | $75,900 | $87,758 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Suffolk
- The population in Suffolk is higher at 98,537, compared to 1,115 in Fort calhoun.
- Residents in Fort calhoun have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 38.5 years in Suffolk.
- Suffolk has a higher median income of $87,758, compared to $75,900 in Fort calhoun.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Fort calhoun and Suffolk at 40.0%.
- Fort calhoun has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 7% in Suffolk.
- Suffolk has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.5% in Fort calhoun.
Demographics
Demographics Fort calhoun vs Suffolk provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort calhoun | Suffolk |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 40 |
| White | 85 | 47 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Suffolk
- In Suffolk, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 1% in Fort calhoun.
- Fort calhoun has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 47% in Suffolk.
- In Suffolk, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Fort calhoun.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort calhoun at 6% compared to 5% in Suffolk.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort calhoun at 8% compared to 6% in Suffolk.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort calhoun and Suffolk at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort calhoun | Suffolk |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.3% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.7% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 15.3% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 14.0% | 15.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.1% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 33.3% | 42.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Suffolk
- In Suffolk, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 12.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Suffolk at 21.4% versus 15.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Suffolk has a higher smoking rate at 15.3% compared to 14.0% in Fort calhoun.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort calhoun at 22.1% compared to 16.6% in Suffolk.
- Suffolk has higher obesity rates at 42.4% compared to 33.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort calhoun at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Suffolk.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort calhoun | Suffolk |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.0% (965) |
| High School Diploma | 33.7% (376) | 14.9% (14,643) |
| Less than High School | 6.5% (72) | 7.8% (7,701) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (161) | 21.0% (20,740) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Suffolk
- In Suffolk, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Fort calhoun.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort calhoun hold a high school diploma at 33.7% compared to 14.9% in Suffolk.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Suffolk at 7.8%, compared to 6.5% in Fort calhoun.
- In Suffolk, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 14.4% in Fort calhoun.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.