Demographics details for Fort calhoun, NE vs Sterling, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort calhoun, NE vs Sterling, IL.

Data Fort calhoun Sterling
Population 1,115 14,566
Median Age 44.1 years 43.0 years
Median Income $75,900 $49,007
Married Families 40.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 8% 12%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 4.2

Population Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Sterling

  • The population in Sterling is higher at 14,566, compared to 1,115 in Fort calhoun.
  • Residents in Fort calhoun have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 43.0 years in Sterling.
  • Fort calhoun has a higher median income of $75,900 compared to $49,007 in Sterling.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort calhoun at 40.0% compared to 32.0% in Sterling.
  • The poverty level is higher in Sterling at 12%, compared to 8% in Fort calhoun.
  • Sterling has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.5% in Fort calhoun.

Demographics

Demographics Fort calhoun vs Sterling provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort calhoun Sterling
Black 1 2
White 85 56
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 6 27
Two or More Races 8 12
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Sterling

  • In Sterling, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Fort calhoun.
  • Fort calhoun has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 56% in Sterling.
  • In Sterling, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Fort calhoun.
  • Sterling has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 6% in Fort calhoun.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sterling at 12%, compared to 8% in Fort calhoun.
  • In Sterling, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fort calhoun.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort calhoun Sterling
Mental Health Not Good 12.3% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 7.7% 12.2%
Depression 15.3% 22.2%
Smoking 14.0% 18.6%
Binge Drinking 22.1% 17.4%
Obesity 33.3% 39.5%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Sterling

  • In Sterling, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 12.3% in Fort calhoun.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling at 22.2% versus 15.3% in Fort calhoun.
  • Sterling has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 14.0% in Fort calhoun.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fort calhoun at 22.1% compared to 17.4% in Sterling.
  • Sterling has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 33.3% in Fort calhoun.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sterling at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort calhoun.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort calhoun Sterling
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.1% (164)
High School Diploma 33.7% (376) 24.1% (3,511)
Less than High School 6.5% (72) 13.8% (2,012)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.4% (161) 11.8% (1,713)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Sterling

  • In Sterling, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Fort calhoun.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort calhoun hold a high school diploma at 33.7% compared to 24.1% in Sterling.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling at 13.8%, compared to 6.5% in Fort calhoun.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort calhoun hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 11.8% in Sterling.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.