Demographics details for Fort calhoun, NE vs Seattle, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort calhoun, NE vs Seattle, WA.
| Data | Fort calhoun | Seattle |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,115 | 749,256 |
| Median Age | 44.1 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $75,900 | $116,068 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Seattle
- The population in Seattle is higher at 749,256, compared to 1,115 in Fort calhoun.
- Residents in Fort calhoun have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 35.4 years in Seattle.
- Seattle has a higher median income of $116,068, compared to $75,900 in Fort calhoun.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort calhoun at 40.0% compared to 35.0% in Seattle.
- The poverty level is higher in Seattle at 9%, compared to 8% in Fort calhoun.
- Seattle has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 2.5% in Fort calhoun.
Demographics
Demographics Fort calhoun vs Seattle provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort calhoun | Seattle |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 7 |
| White | 85 | 59 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 17 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Seattle
- In Seattle, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 1% in Fort calhoun.
- Fort calhoun has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 59% in Seattle.
- In Seattle, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 0% in Fort calhoun.
- Seattle has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 6% in Fort calhoun.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Seattle at 9%, compared to 8% in Fort calhoun.
- In Seattle, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fort calhoun.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort calhoun | Seattle |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.3% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.7% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 15.3% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 14.0% | 8.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.1% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 33.3% | 23.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Seattle
- In Seattle, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 12.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Seattle at 23.6% versus 15.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort calhoun at 14.0% compared to 8.6% in Seattle.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort calhoun at 22.1% compared to 17.6% in Seattle.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort calhoun at 33.3% compared to 23.8% in Seattle.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort calhoun at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Seattle.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort calhoun | Seattle |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (6,839) |
| High School Diploma | 33.7% (376) | 5.8% (43,106) |
| Less than High School | 6.5% (72) | 4.7% (35,004) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (161) | 49.4% (369,798) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Seattle
- In Seattle, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Fort calhoun.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort calhoun hold a high school diploma at 33.7% compared to 5.8% in Seattle.
- More residents in Fort calhoun have less than a high school education at 6.5% compared to 4.7% in Seattle.
- In Seattle, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.4% compared to 14.4% in Fort calhoun.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.