Demographics details for Fort calhoun, NE vs Rudd, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort calhoun, NE vs Rudd, IA.
| Data | Fort calhoun | Rudd |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,115 | 348 |
| Median Age | 44.1 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $75,900 | $70,375 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Rudd
- In Fort calhoun, the population is higher at 1,115, compared to 348 in Rudd.
- Residents in Fort calhoun have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 37.3 years in Rudd.
- Fort calhoun has a higher median income of $75,900 compared to $70,375 in Rudd.
- In Rudd, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 40.0% in Fort calhoun.
- Fort calhoun has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 0% in Rudd.
- Rudd has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.5% in Fort calhoun.
Demographics
Demographics Fort calhoun vs Rudd provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort calhoun | Rudd |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 85 | 98 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Rudd
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort calhoun at 1% compared to 0% in Rudd.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rudd at 98% compared to 85% in Fort calhoun.
- In Rudd, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Fort calhoun.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort calhoun at 6% compared to 0% in Rudd.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort calhoun at 8% compared to 1% in Rudd.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort calhoun and Rudd at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort calhoun | Rudd |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.3% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.7% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 15.3% | 18.0% |
| Smoking | 14.0% | 16.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.1% | 23.0% |
| Obesity | 33.3% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Rudd
- In Rudd, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.7% compared to 12.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Rudd at 18.0% versus 15.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Rudd has a higher smoking rate at 16.8% compared to 14.0% in Fort calhoun.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rudd at 23.0% compared to 22.1% in Fort calhoun.
- Rudd has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 33.3% in Fort calhoun.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rudd at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort calhoun.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort calhoun | Rudd |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 33.7% (376) | 33.0% (115) |
| Less than High School | 6.5% (72) | 16.7% (58) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (161) | 9.5% (33) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Rudd
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Fort calhoun and Rudd at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort calhoun hold a high school diploma at 33.7% compared to 33.0% in Rudd.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rudd at 16.7%, compared to 6.5% in Fort calhoun.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort calhoun hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 9.5% in Rudd.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.